Kimi K3.1 Pro: Moonshot AI Curbs Hacking Ability Ahead of Open-Weights Release

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Moonshot AI Curbs Hacking Ability Ahead of Open-Weights Release

Moonshot AI said on Saturday, October 24, 2026, that it deliberately weakened the hacking skills of Kimi K3.1 Pro, the most advanced system the Beijing startup has built, by pulling cyber-related material out of the training process before release. The company said the change costs the model only a modest slice of its offensive capability, according to Crypto Briefing.

The decision matters because Moonshot plans to publish the model's weight files, reportedly by November 4, 2026, which would make Kimi K3.1 Pro the highest-scoring open-weights model available. Few Chinese labs have publicly acknowledged deliberately shaping a model's offensive-security ability, and Moonshot connects that choice directly to the planned release of the weights.

What Moonshot Removed and Why

The company said it scrubbed cyber-related material from two stages of development: the training corpus and the reinforcement-learning environments, while keeping general coding skills in place. Moonshot said its engineers traced steadily improving vulnerability-research performance to cyber-related content embedded in the general mid-training corpus and to cyber-related tasks in the reinforcement-learning mix, then identified and removed that data from both training stages for the open-weight release.

The approach sits earlier in the pipeline than the refusal filters that dominate public safety discussion of language models. Rather than training a fully capable model and then teaching it to decline malicious requests, Moonshot changed what the model learned from in the first place. The company said it stripped cyber tasks from the reinforcement-learning environments, which targets agentic skill rather than raw knowledge, and said it kept general coding capabilities, suggesting a narrow filter rather than a blanket purge.

Moonshot framed the work as a way to avoid releasing open weights that would extend the absolute frontier of cyber capability. The company does not present the model as harmless for security work; its narrower pledge is that Kimi K3.1 Pro will not rank as the most capable publicly available tool for attacking software. Moonshot said the model's cyber skills still trail those of top proprietary systems that have been on the market for three months or longer.

According to Crypto Briefing, the company said its goal is for this model not to advance the boundaries of cyber-offensive capability, with incremental improvements to defensive safeguards planned for future releases.

The 81.0% Figure and Its Limits

On an internal test of finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities, the released model reached 81.0%, while a comparable build trained without the risk-reduction measures reached 90.5%, according to Reuters and The Information. Moonshot ran its released configuration and the unfiltered version, then compared the scores.

The benchmark, which Moonshot calls xdev-bench-hard, consists of expert-curated, source-code-based vulnerability discovery and exploitation tasks, with scores measured at pass@3, according to Unite. Moonshot said the gap between the two builds demonstrates that removing the data cuts cyber capability well below what the same training pipeline would otherwise deliver.

All of the figures behind the claim are self-reported, and no outside party has verified them. Moonshot designed the test, chose the environment, ran both versions and reported the scores. A fair test of the 81.0% claim would need independent researchers to evaluate the released model on exploit tasks of their own choosing, in a setting Moonshot did not construct.

The filtered model still represents a large jump over its predecessor. Reports on the company's comparison put the earlier Kimi K3 at 33.3% on the same test, and The Decoder reported that DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash reaches 85.7%. Moonshot said Kimi K3.1 Pro outperformed K3 despite the filtering, and that it retained general coding strength.

A Stronger Model Underneath the Curbs

Kimi K3.1 Pro is a post-trained version of Kimi K3, built with what Moonshot describes as substantially larger post-training compute. The company describes it as its most capable 3T-class open-weight model to date, with a context window of 1 million tokens. The Decoder reported the model matches K3 in size, at 2.8 trillion total parameters with 104 billion active.

On Terminal-Bench 4.0, which evaluates coding agents on realistic, resource-constrained terminal tasks, K3.1 Pro scored 65.7%, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 58.2% and narrowly behind Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.4%, according to Unite. Crypto Briefing noted the result places an open-weights Chinese model alongside a top closed US system on that benchmark.

The model jumped to fourth place on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with 55 points, just behind Claude Opus 5.5, according to The Decoder. Moonshot also reported a top score of 64.4 on OfficeQA Pro v2, a test of complex fiscal data analysis using real financial documents, and said the model's claim-level hallucination rate on an internal stress test fell from 23.4% for K3 to 8.3%.

Moonshot also released a faster companion variant, Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed, which the company said delivers two to three times the standard model's speed with identical capabilities. The model is live on Kimi.ai, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API, with pricing of $2.00 input and $10.00 output per million tokens, according to MarkTechPost. Kimi Enterprise administrators can enable K3.1 Pro for their organizations, with access off by default at launch, according to Unite.

Pressure Behind the Decision

The announcement did not arrive in a vacuum. Concern is rising among governments, tech firms and security researchers that AI could lower the cost and difficulty of sophisticated hacking, according to The Economic Times. Against that backdrop, a lab announcing cyber curbs in a model reads as a response to pressure rather than an isolated gesture.

The decision also comes after Kimi K3 attracted scrutiny for how well it handled cyber tasks. Crypto Briefing described the new release as partly an answer to that attention, an effort to demonstrate that Moonshot can ship a more capable model without distributing a more dangerous attack tool.

Moonshot competes with closed Western labs and with other Chinese open-weights developers, and its filtering experiment adds a new axis to that competition: how much risk a model carries once released. The company's approach stands out because it still works after weights go public, unlike refusal-based safeguards that can be stripped from an open model. Moonshot has effectively volunteered a disclosure that competitors will feel pressure to match or explain away.

What Comes Next for Kimi K3.1 Pro

If Moonshot releases the weights as planned by November 4, 2026, researchers and security teams will be able to test the company's claims independently. Once weights are public, a user with modest hardware and a security dataset could also try to rebuild some of what Moonshot removed, which limits how much any training-time filter can guarantee.

Moonshot will have to show that the 81.0% score leaves enough room for legitimate use. If the company's claim holds, people who use the model for ordinary programming should see little change. The commercial effect of the announcement is hard to size, since the sources give no revenue or usage figures for the model beyond its API pricing.

The company's stated goal is narrower than making the model safe: it is to avoid extending the absolute frontier of cyber capability. That phrasing assumes a frontier that holds still, and it does not, so defenders cannot wait for a verdict on Kimi K3.1 Pro before adjusting their own posture.

Conclusion

Moonshot AI has released Kimi K3.1 Pro with cyber-related data deliberately removed from both its training corpus and reinforcement-learning environments, a trade the company says cut internal exploit-test performance from 90.5% to 81.0% while leaving general coding strength intact. All of the figures are self-reported and unverified. The next concrete step is the planned open-weights release, reportedly by November 4, 2026, which would let outside researchers test the claims on tasks and in environments Moonshot did not control, and would make the model the highest-scoring open-weights system available if the release proceeds as planned.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Moonshot AI remove from Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Moonshot AI said it removed cyber-related data from both the training corpus and the reinforcement-learning environments used to develop Kimi K3.1 Pro, while retaining general coding skills. The company said it traced improving vulnerability-research performance to cyber content in those training stages and stripped it out for the open-weight release.

How much did the filtering cut Kimi K3.1 Pro's hacking ability?

On Moonshot's internal benchmark of vulnerability discovery and exploitation tasks, Kimi K3.1 Pro scored 81.0%, versus 90.5% for a similar version trained without the risk-reduction measures, according to Reuters and The Information. The earlier Kimi K3 scored 33.3% on the same test. All figures are self-reported and not independently verified.

When will Kimi K3.1 Pro's open weights be released?

Moonshot reportedly planned to publish the model's weight files by November 4, 2026. If the release proceeds as planned, Kimi K3.1 Pro would become the highest-scoring open-weights model available, and outside researchers would be able to test Moonshot's safety claims independently.

How does Kimi K3.1 Pro perform on coding benchmarks?

On Terminal-Bench 4.0, K3.1 Pro scored 65.7%, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 58.2% and narrowly behind Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.4%, according to Unite. The model also reached fourth place on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with 55 points, according to The Decoder.

How much does Kimi K3.1 Pro cost to use?

Pricing for K3.1 Pro is $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, according to MarkTechPost. The model is live on Kimi.ai, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API, and a faster Highspeed variant runs at two to three times the speed with identical capabilities.

Sources

Ledger Probes Supply Chain Breach After CryptoBilis Reseller Hack

Ledger Probes Supply Chain Breach After CryptoBilis Reseller Hack

Hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger announced it is examining customer balance drains in Southeast Asia tied to devices distributed by authorized regional merchant CryptoBilis, instructing the vendor to halt all shipments and sales transactions immediately. The Paris-based firm launched its inquiry into the CryptoBilis reseller hack on October 9, 2026, amid widespread user reports of unauthorized fund movements across multiple blockchains, according to The Coin Republic. Customers who purchased units from the vendor over the past 90 days have been cautioned by Ledger to halt any initial configurations.

Crypto Briefing reported that malicious actors planted hidden cellular components directly into the hardware wallets distributed by the authorized seller. The internal components allegedly transmitted user recovery phrases outward via cellular networks, bypassing typical offline safeguards. More than $86 million in digital asset losses has been linked to the breach, which has prompted urgent warnings from Ledger Support.

Unauthorized Implants and Acquisition Claims

Crypto Briefing reported that attackers inserted concealed hardware inside units distributed by CryptoBilis. According to these findings, the clandestine modifications featured embedded circuit boards placed directly behind device screens to intercept recovery phrases upon generation. This setup enabled attackers to extract the critical data without requiring physical access to the owner's unit after delivery.

Crypto Briefing also reported on claims circulating on social media platform X alleging that hackers did not merely tamper with hardware in transit. The report highlighted social media posts alleging that the attackers bought the CryptoBilis reseller business outright, required the firm to execute a non-disclosure agreement, and then systematically introduced spyware components into the inventory before customer distribution.

Crypto Briefing noted that Ledger has not verified the assertions that hackers purchased the regional reseller or executed a non-disclosure agreement. Nevertheless, the revelations have intensified focus on the CryptoBilis reseller hack, demonstrating potential points of failure when third-party supply channels are compromised by hostile actors.

Instructions for Customers in the CryptoBilis Reseller Hack

In public announcements distributed on social media platform X, Ledger Support directed purchasers who acquired devices through CryptoBilis within the last 90 days to take immediate protective measures. Customers holding uninitialized wallets received explicit directives to leave them unconfigured until further notice. For buyers who have already completed the initial setup process, Ledger advised moving all balances over to an alternative Ledger signer using an entirely new recovery seed phrase.

The manufacturer reiterated that the incident response does not automatically assume every single piece of inventory delivered through the distributor was compromised. However, the 90-day purchase parameter remains in place as an active advisory while Ledger continues technical investigations into the supply chain breach.

Ledger Support stressed that the temporary operational pause for sales and dispatch activities at CryptoBilis will persist while the full scope of the security issue is examined. Owners encountering suspicious activity or requiring guidance are instructed to follow the firm's verified communication channels.

The guidance issued during the CryptoBilis reseller hack underscores that anyone who acquired hardware from the distributor during the specified window must refrain from entering credentials. Buyers who fail to observe the caution could leave private key data vulnerable to the alleged cellular extraction tools identified by security researchers, according to reporting by Crypto Briefing.

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Under Review

The CryptoBilis reseller hack has cast a spotlight on retail distributor risks within the hardware security sector. By targeting an intermediary merchant directly, the attackers were able to bypass standard security assumptions associated with cold storage manufacturing. Decrypt and The Coin Republic reported that Ledger's investigation remains focused on the specific regional supply partner rather than core device architecture.

Until investigators conclude their physical and logistical reviews, Ledger is maintaining the sales suspension on the vendor. The company continues to evaluate the reported customer asset drains, with the full extent of compromised devices still under assessment by company technicians.

The emergence of the CryptoBilis reseller hack demonstrates the operational complexity of policing downstream logistics across international consumer markets. By requiring the merchant to suspend both online retail sales and pending courier dispatches, Ledger aims to isolate further consumer exposure across Southeast Asia while the technical inquiry proceeds.

According to reporting by The Coin Republic, the inquiry launched on October 9, 2026, centers on resolving how the funds left client wallets following purchases from the merchant. As Ledger reviews the circumstances of the CryptoBilis reseller hack, regional buyers are reminded that safety precautions apply specifically to inventory sourced through that commercial partner over the previous three months.

Conclusion

Ledger has halted all device sales and shipments from Southeast Asian reseller CryptoBilis as it investigates reports of unauthorized hardware modifications leaking recovery phrases. The company's advisory applies strictly to customers who bought products from the distributor over the past 90 days, instructing them to halt setup or move assets to a new signer using a fresh seed phrase. Ledger's next concrete step is to continue its active technical probe into the affected devices and reseller operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CryptoBilis reseller hack?

The CryptoBilis reseller hack refers to reported supply chain tampering involving Southeast Asian reseller CryptoBilis. According to Crypto Briefing, attackers placed unauthorized cellular implants inside Ledger devices to intercept users' recovery phrases, leading to tens of millions in suspected customer losses across multiple blockchains.

What should customers who bought from CryptoBilis do?

Ledger instructs anyone who purchased a hardware wallet from CryptoBilis in the past 90 days not to initialize the device. Customers who have already set up a wallet must transfer their funds to a different device using a completely new recovery seed phrase.

Did hackers purchase the reseller CryptoBilis?

Crypto Briefing reported that claims surfaced on X alleging hackers purchased CryptoBilis outright and had it sign a non-disclosure agreement to distribute tampered units. However, this assertion has not been confirmed by Ledger.

When did Ledger launch its investigation into CryptoBilis?

The Coin Republic reported that Ledger initiated its investigation on October 9, 2026, following user reports of customer asset losses linked to units purchased from the distributor.

Sources

According to reports, Data of accounts of 400 million Twitter users were available for purchase on the black market.

According to reports, Data of accounts of 400 million Twitter users were available for purchase on the black market.

One of the world's largest user data leaks? Hudson Rock, a cybercrime business, stated that 400 million Twitter users' personal information has lately been sold on the black market. Along with Vitalik Buterin and Donald Trump, the French Ministry of Justice has been targeted.

Twitter data has been leaked.

This information was provided to us by the cybercrime business Hudson Rock. According to their statistics, more than 400 million Twitter users' personal data are presently for sale on the dark web's illicit market. This data leak is considered a "credible danger" by the firm. This hacker's collection of sensitive data includes email addresses and phone numbers used to create accounts on the social network.

There are certainly powerful people among the 400 million possible victims. In reality, the hacker's selling announcement is accompanied with an example of 1000 lines. These individuals and organisations include Vitalik Buterin, a renowned co-founder of Ethereum (ETH), Donald Trump, and even the French Ministry of Justice.

According to Hudson Rock, the hacker obtained this information in early 2022 as a result of a weakness discovered in the Twitter programme. The intelligence organisation, however, does not believe it can authenticate the validity of every line in this database.

DeFiYield, on the other hand, examined the 1,000 rows provided by the hacker as an example and claimed that this sample indeed matches the genuine data. However, it is astonishing that a data breach was not discovered earlier by Twitter personnel and Elon Musk when he purchased the firm, especially given the social network's 450 million monthly active users.

Elon Musk was summoned by a hacker at Black Market.

If this data breach is accurate, it might pose a serious problem for crypto ecosystem actors that operate anonymously — or pseudonymously — on Twitter, as their identities could be disclosed. Scammers face an even larger risk, as they may face legal consequences for their actions.

Of course, the majority of users are at risk. Malicious actors might use these email addresses to conduct phishing attacks. Indeed, email is still a popular way for scammers to take cryptocurrency or NFTs. In addition to selling the data file, the hacker contacted Elon Musk. He promised him $276 million in order to prevent the sale of the data and a sanction from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) agency.

As a reminder, the CNIL fined Uber in 2018 for leaking sensitive data on 57 million users, including 1.4 million on French territory. Some of the consumers involved thought the fine, which amounted to 400,000 euros for the French company, was too low.

Let us utilise this chance to reinforce an essential point: it is critical to be as cautious and diligent as possible as you progress in the Web3 environment. Ensure that your various accounts are secured using the two-factor authentication method, that your passwords are updated on a regular basis, and that your cryptocurrencies are stored securely.

Phishing Scam Offering A Fake Airdrop Succeed To Rob Uniswap Users

Phishing Scam Offering A Fake Airdrop Succeed To Rob Uniswap Users

The global crypto market is now in a downtrend condition. Investors are eagerly waiting for the next bull run. The digital assets are held by crypto investors for a long time. In this unfavorable situation, a phishing scam has shaken the Ethereum blockchain. The overall market has already been impacted by this $8.6 million scam. A phishing scam took place on the Uniswap exchange. The aim was to steal the Uniswap users' assets with a smart contract.

Uniswap is the largest decentralized crypto exchange in the global market. This exchange user have been scammed on July 12, 2022. The phishing scam offered some fake UNI tokens and grabbed all the assets of the users with laundering tricks. Over $8 million loss was faced in the Ethereum blockchain.

Phishing

How Did The Phishing Scam Happen?

Phishing is a hacking process that is implemented through fake mimicking websites and well-planned techniques. The current phishing scam was led by a hacker through a smart airdrop. Airdrop is the malicious or fake offer of a free token given by unknown sources or hackers.

This phishing started by mimicking the Uniswap website. The scammer offered free UNI tokens to Uniswap users. There were about 400 free UNI tokens. Which is priced at around $2,200. The website seemed like the real Uniswap website. Though there was a red alert in its domain. The official domain is .org. Whereas the phishing happened with .com.

The scammer's aim was only to convince the users to redirect to this fake website. Then they were offered free UNI tokens which were fake. In this stage, users were asked to click to claim the reward. After clicking on the button, unknowingly users gave the entire control of their Ethereum wallet to the scammer. Then it succeeded.

The Amount Of The Phishing Scam :

The total amount of the loss led by this phishing is around $8.6 million. It has robbed a total of 7,574 Ethereum tokens. Which is priced at over $8 million.

It was reported that the fake reward link was circulated among 73,399 users, who held UNI tokens. The sender of the airdrop had no validation. Though it acted like the original Uniswap source.

The scammer created a mask for the 'setApprovalForAll' function. It helped to allow redeeming all Uniswap V3 LP tokens for Ethereum in the user's wallet.

In the first attempt, the hacker succeeded in stealing 7,574 Ethereum tokens. Then immediately, 7,500 Ethereum was moved to Tornado cash service with laundering tricks.

How to protect yourself from a phishing scam?

Nowadays, the airdrop is the most popular weapon to get the phishing victim the hackers. Airdrop means free cryptocurrency which seems like it is offered by the original service provider. But airdrop is the initial stage to getting a successful phishing scam.

First of all, if any free product is given to someone then it is blindly considered that the user is the product. In the case of free currencies, it can happen a few times by authentic sources. But not always. If you are a crypto trader or investor, you should be aware of this basic thing to protect yourself. The protection can be implemented by analyzing main three ambits-

  1. The domain name of the source should be checked well. It should be verified if the source's website is authentic or if it is different from the real one. If not, then go back and don't look into it.
  2. Next is the validation. The validation of the offer can be checked easily. You can search the original website. If there are the same offer for the users and valid ones given to you then it is favorable.
  3. Last but not the least, the source of the offer can be verified. Verifying the source exposes all the blunders in it.