French Lawmakers Advance €100K Crypto Wallet Disclosure Proposal

French Lawmakers Advance €100K Crypto Wallet Disclosure Proposal

French lawmakers have moved to enforce stricter oversight on unhosted digital holdings, endorsing an amendment that establishes a €100K crypto wallet disclosure rule for individuals holding significant assets outside centralized intermediaries. Under the proposal, investors storing at least 100,000 euros in personal wallets would be compelled to disclose those balances to tax authorities or face financial penalties.

On October 9, 2026, the National Assembly Finance Committee approved a measure obligating people to report unhosted digital wallets meeting or exceeding that financial bar, according to Crypto Briefing. Crypto Briefing reported that regulated crypto service providers already carry reporting obligations, while self-custodied wallets have largely operated outside that framework until now.

The measure mandates that people submit annual reports if their personal unhosted balances stand at €100,000 when measured on December 31, Crypto Briefing reported. Crypto Briefing also noted that holders who skip the paperwork could face fines of up to €10,000.

According to KuCoin, the provision focuses on tokens kept away from regulated service entities, covering private software or hardware setups, and writes fresh reporting terms directly into French tax statutes. In legal terms, the text would add a provision to France's general tax code requiring disclosure based on how much the assets are worth as of December 31 and establishing fines of up to 10,000 euros for failure to declare.

Prior Attempts and Current Scope

This is not France's first attempt at wallet disclosure, according to Crypto Briefing. Crypto Briefing reported that an earlier initiative introduced during 2026 had sought a reporting bar of merely €5,000.

Crypto Briefing reported that the increased amount mirrors safety worries following physical assaults directed at domestic cryptocurrency owners. Placing the limit at €100,000 limits scrutiny to wealthier investors, though any government database of wealthy crypto holders becomes a potential target, a concern the higher threshold addresses only partially.

For most French crypto users, the immediate impact is limited, Crypto Briefing reported. The proposal is not law, and the €100,000 threshold excludes smaller holders entirely.

For larger self-custody holders, the calculus could change if the measure passes, according to Crypto Briefing. Direct ownership has attracted market participants because unhosted funds bypass documentation structures that govern centralized trading platforms, and a mandatory declaration would erode that distinction for anyone above the line.

The €100K Crypto Wallet Disclosure Mechanics

Under the measure advanced by parliamentarians, the €100K crypto wallet disclosure requirement mandates that citizens evaluate their personal holdings and report those meeting the value threshold. Those failing to fulfill the declaration could risk financial sanctions of up to €10,000, according to Crypto Briefing.

The amendment was introduced by deputies Charles de Courson, Jean-Pierre Bataille, and Michel Castellani, who all belong to the LIOT parliamentary group, both Crypto Briefing and KuCoin reported. KuCoin noted that the Finance Committee passed this text alongside four other digital asset provisions.

KuCoin reported that the amendment sponsors said it is meant to address tax evasion concerns, pointing to a parliamentary inquiry into the taxation of wealthy individuals. Crypto Briefing and KuCoin reported that the inquiry showed €3.5 billion in crypto capital gains in 2021, compared with only €400 million declared to tax authorities that same year.

That left roughly €3.1 billion unaccounted for on paper, and the amendment is designed to close part of that gap, Crypto Briefing reported. Once fiscal officers learn of a major personal address, taxpayers face far greater difficulty hiding profits originating from those balances.

Much of the debate around crypto taxation and compliance tends to focus on the transparency offered by intermediaries, according to KuCoin. The emphasis on assets held outside crypto-asset service providers suggests lawmakers see a compliance gap when individuals retain control directly through personal wallets, shifting the burden toward individuals to calculate the euro value of their holdings at year-end and file declarations.

Committee Rejection and Legislative Roadblocks

Despite committee approval, the legislative path for the €100K crypto wallet disclosure rule got messy within hours of the vote, according to Crypto Briefing. Later on October 9, the related budget revenue section was rejected by a vote of 31-3, Crypto Briefing reported.

Public broadcaster LCP reported that lawmakers rejected the revenue section of the 2027 budget bill by 31 votes to 3 after the committee's adoption, according to KuCoin. TOKENPOST also reported that the committee voted 31-3, with two abstentions, to reject the budget's entire revenue section after extensive revisions.

That revenue section now has to be reintroduced and voted on in the full National Assembly, Crypto Briefing reported. KuCoin and TOKENPOST reported that lawmakers are scheduled to begin debating the revenue section in the National Assembly on Tuesday, using the government's original draft as the starting point.

According to KuCoin, citing French tech publication Clubic, the crypto amendments would need to be submitted again and approved during parliamentary proceedings to become part of the final legislation. TOKENPOST similarly reported that the tax measures need to be reintroduced and approved in the full chamber to take effect.

The next marker to watch is October 13, 2026, when debate resumes in the full National Assembly, Crypto Briefing reported. Crypto Briefing also noted observers will watch whether the €100,000 figure holds through floor debate, or whether lawmakers push it back toward the lower number that failed in April.

Accompanying Exit Tax and Stablecoin Measures

The €100K crypto wallet disclosure measure also sits inside a wider package of proposed fiscal reforms aimed at digital assets, Crypto Briefing reported. Crypto Briefing noted that one measure would impose an exit tax on crypto holdings over €800,000 when individuals relocate abroad.

TOKENPOST reported that a second amendment would impose an exit tax on unrealized crypto gains when French tax residents relocate abroad. According to TOKENPOST, it would apply to households holding more than €800,000 in crypto assets across exchanges, overseas accounts, or self-custodied wallets, if the taxpayer had been a French tax resident for at least six of the previous 10 years.

A holder who dislikes the new disclosure rules might consider moving abroad, but if holdings exceed €800,000, the exit tax would make that move more expensive, Crypto Briefing reported. Meanwhile, KuCoin reported that Cointelegraph previously noted discussions on ending tax deferrals on conversions into fiat-backed stablecoins.

TOKENPOST reported that another approved amendment would treat the exchange of crypto assets for stablecoins covered by the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets framework as a taxable sale. That measure would apply to transactions beginning January 1, 2027, using the taxpayer's weighted-average acquisition cost to calculate gains, while another amendment would allow crypto losses to offset gains for up to 10 years instead of one year.

Conclusion

French legislators have advanced the €100K crypto wallet disclosure proposal through the Finance Committee to close an estimated €3.1 billion gap between realized and reported cryptocurrency gains. However, because the committee rejected the broader budget revenue section by a 31-3 vote, the mandatory reporting rules and accompanying exit taxes on holdings over €800,000 must now be reintroduced and debated on the floor of the National Assembly starting on October 13, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the threshold for the €100K crypto wallet disclosure rule?

The amendment approved by the National Assembly Finance Committee targets self-custodied cryptocurrency holdings valued at €100,000 or more as of December 31, requiring owners of unhosted wallets above that level to submit annual declarations to tax authorities.

What penalties do individuals face for failing to report self-custodied wallets?

Under the proposed amendment backed by the committee, taxpayers who fail to disclose their self-custodied crypto assets valued at or above the €100,000 mark risk incurring financial fines of up to €10,000.

Why did the revenue section of the 2027 budget bill fail in committee?

Following the adoption of the crypto amendments, lawmakers on the Finance Committee voted 31 to 3, with two abstentions, to reject the overall revenue section of the 2027 budget bill after extensive revisions.

How does the proposed crypto exit tax work for French residents moving abroad?

TOKENPOST reported that the exit tax amendment would apply to unrealized cryptocurrency gains for households holding more than €800,000 in crypto across exchanges, offshore accounts, or self-custody, provided they were French tax residents for at least six of the previous 10 years.

Sources

SEC Launches Five-Year Innovation Exemption for Tokenized Stocks

SEC Launches Five-Year Innovation Exemption for Tokenized Stocks

The Securities and Exchange Commission issued an order on September 17, 2026, creating a temporary innovation exemption to facilitate on-chain trading of tokenized National Market System (NMS) stocks. The relief runs for a five-year term through September 17, 2031, allowing qualifying venues to operate under conditional exemptions from exchange registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The order allows registered broker-dealers and alternative trading systems to trade tokenized shares on public blockchains without registering as national securities exchanges, according to Forkast News. The move establishes a structured venue layer for tokenized equity transactions following a surge to $15.6 billion in monthly tokenized equity volume in September 2026.

The Mechanics of the Innovation Exemption

The SEC innovation exemption establishes a regulatory sandbox that permits an unaffiliated company to tokenize a public company's listed equity without corporate involvement. Tokenized securities venues (TSVs) may then offer those digital shares for trading, subject to conditions that include mandatory volume caps and platform limits.

Trading may take place only across three public blockchains: Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain, Forkast News reported. The SEC explicitly identified these networks for the controlled trial rather than establishing an open-ended channel for digital equities.

To participate, a TSV must post a public notice at least 30 calendar days before launching operations and email the SEC within one business day of that publication. Platforms can implement access controls by restricting liquidity pools to allow-listed wallet addresses or by programming the tokenized stock itself to transfer solely among verified wallets.

Notice Windows and Issuer Objections

Public companies face a strict 30-day timeline once an unaffiliated firm seeks to tokenize their shares under the innovation exemption framework. A TSV must deliver a formal written notice to the company, giving the corporate issuer 30 calendar days from receipt to submit an objection before tokenized trading can start.

If a corporation does not object within the 30-day period, the firm is considered to have accepted third-party tokenized trading of its shares, Latham & Watkins LLP reported. If an objection is lodged, the venue must update its public notice within five business days to disclose the objecting issuer and contact the SEC by email within one business day.

A corporate objection halts that specific TSV from using the exemption for that issuer's NMS stock, yet it does not prevent third parties from tokenizing shares or stop competing TSVs from filing separate requests. Issuers that tokenize directly or authorize their own tokenization are entirely exempt from the issuer notice mandate.

Market Structure and Infrastructure Concerns

The framework generates distinct market structure questions because TSV activity bypasses the consolidated tape and is not routed to a securities information processor. TSV trading does not register in standard volume channels, meaning consolidated feeds might understate true market liquidity, trading turnover, and daily volume metrics.

Latham & Watkins LLP noted that while volume ceilings apply to each individual TSV, aggregate on-chain turnover could surpass those thresholds across multiple independent venues. Issuers are advised to coordinate with listing exchanges and transfer agents regarding how on-chain activity is measured, while checking with legal staff as notices arrive.

The framework covers all exchange-listed domestic stocks as well as foreign private issuers, exposing American Depositary Receipt issuers to dual-halt coordination risks. A TSV must halt trading when the primary US exchange halts, but foreign shares remain vulnerable to overnight trading discrepancies if overseas listing bourses freeze while US trading desks are closed.

Industry Reaction to the Innovation Exemption

The new rules coincide with proposed SEC modernization of transfer agent rules permitting distributed ledger tracking, according to Forkast News. Early institutional activity under the sandbox is anticipated to center on highly liquid, widely held equities as market participants evaluate the innovation exemption.

Corporate stakeholders have begun submitting formal input regarding the regulatory perimeter. FinTech Magazine reported that Bitcoin Bancorp, Inc. submitted a formal public comment asking the SEC to clearly distinguish pure infrastructure vendors from registered securities dealers.

Bitcoin Bancorp Executive Vice President Eric Noveshen stated that "Tokenization of stocks and real-world assets is gaining momentum within capital market structures and Bitcoin Bancorp’s letter to the SEC supports the proposition that certain digital-asset access providers should receive securities-law relief." Noveshen added that "A company that verifies identity, has full AML/KYC compliance, and facilitating trading of tokenized stocks should receive an exemption from the definition of a “dealer" under federal securities statutes.

Under the regulatory order, eligible tokens must convey identical rights to the underlying stock. Venues are permitted to offer a tokenized NMS stock for trading only after verifying that holders receive full rights parity, specifically including proportional voting rights.

Holders of tokenized shares would generally be classified as beneficial owners of the stock rather than record owners on an issuer's master securityholder ledger, Latham & Watkins LLP reported. The tokenizing institution or an affiliated entity typically acts as the depository intermediary holding the underlying registered shares.

Companies pursuing direct tokenization gain greater oversight over their wrapper, trading venue, and disclosures. Meanwhile, issuers assessing third-party venue filings under the innovation exemption must review operations carefully, as unaddressed notices permanently open the door to on-chain trading.

Conclusion

The SEC innovation exemption establishes an active five-year test environment for trading tokenized NMS stocks on Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain. As the immediate exemption runs toward its September 17, 2031 expiration date, the SEC will collect trading and settlement data to decide whether to codify permanent rules or allow the relief to sunset.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the duration of the SEC innovation exemption?

The SEC innovation exemption was issued on September 17, 2026, and provides a five-year temporary conditional relief period running until September 17, 2031, according to Latham & Watkins LLP and Forkast News.

Which blockchains qualify under the SEC order?

According to Forkast News, trading under the SEC exemption is restricted to three qualifying public distributed ledgers: Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain.

How long do public companies have to object to an Issuer Notice?

Corporate issuers have 30 calendar days from the date they receive an Issuer Notice to object; failing to act allows the tokenized securities venue to begin trading on day 31, according to Latham & Watkins LLP.

Do tokenized shares carry shareholder voting rights?

Yes. A tokenized securities venue may only list tokenized NMS stocks after confirming that token holders receive the same economic and voting rights as underlying shareholders, establishing them as beneficial owners under Rule 13d-3(a).

Sources

Thailand SEC Issues Framework for Local Bitcoin and Ether Crypto ETFs

Thailand SEC Issues Framework for Local Bitcoin and Ether Crypto ETFs

Thailand's Securities and Exchange Commission has finalized a regulatory framework allowing local fund managers to establish spot crypto ETFs, with the rules scheduled to take effect Oct. 16, 2026. Under the 11 notifications released by the regulator on Oct. 8, the framework permits products tracking bitcoin and ether to list and trade exclusively on the Stock Exchange of Thailand.

The framework establishes operational parameters for digital asset fund management, the appointment of qualified custodians, and investor protections across the domestic financial market. While the rulebook opens the door for fund sponsors to submit products for regulatory clearance, regulators noted that each individual investment vehicle must still secure dedicated SEC approval before public trading begins.

According to CryptoRank and local reports, the finalized measures set explicit operational expectations for any domestic asset management company planning to enter the space. Under the published structure, the scope of the market remains intentionally narrow during its debut window, anchoring initial permissions strictly to products tied to the two largest digital assets.

Custody Mandates and Exchange Exclusivity for Crypto ETFs

The finalized rules mandate that all underlying digital tokens held by the funds must be stored with digital asset custodians supervised directly by the Thai SEC. Fund managers will not have the option of listing on secondary domestic trading venues, as products are restricted entirely to the Stock Exchange of Thailand.

Crypto Briefing reported that the SEC announced its operational requirements on Oct. 16, 2026, setting baseline standards for asset management companies and mutual fund supervisors. The regulator also noted that it may evaluate the inclusion of qualified foreign digital asset custodians at a future stage if deemed suitable.

The rules outline detailed criteria covering technical infrastructure and organizational readiness before an institution can supervise custody pools for crypto ETFs. By centralizing holding verification with locally authorized entities, the commission intends to retain direct regulatory oversight over reserve balances and prevent offshore operational risks.

Institutional Allocation and Cross-Border Investment Limits

Alongside requirements for new offerings, the SEC updated its provisions to allow domestic mutual funds and private funds to invest directly in Thai-established crypto ETFs within their existing statutory investment boundaries. Previously, local funds were permitted to allocate capital only toward foreign-domiciled crypto products.

The commission has barred securities firms from offering margin loans to investors seeking to buy crypto ETFs, aiming to limit leverage risks. During the initial rollout, regulators have blocked retail access to cross-border crypto wrappers, prohibiting local brokerages from assisting general retail investors with foreign crypto ETFs while restricting such transactions strictly to institutional and ultra-high-net-worth clients.

Financial intermediaries are also barred from listing or distributing alternative instruments referencing offshore crypto products, including depositary receipts. The SEC confirmed that these restrictions will remain intact throughout the initial phase of implementation.

Consultation Process and Launch Requirements

The finalization of the 11 regulatory notifications follows a pair of public consultations conducted by the regulator earlier in the year. The SEC sought industry feedback regarding its core principles across April and May 2026, followed by a second consultation phase covering the detailed draft text throughout August and September.

Industry executives emphasized that Oct. 16 represents the legal activation of the regulatory regime rather than a confirmed debut date for live market trading. Fuwattananukul stated that commercial success will depend on structural execution, observing, "Whether these products draw meaningful investment will depend on a few things: competitive fees, tight tracking of the underlying asset, and investor education."

Addressing the behavioral hurdles facing traditional market participants, Fuwattananukul remarked, "For many investors, especially those wary of opening exchange accounts or managing wallets, ETFs through their existing brokerage accounts remove a real barrier." Chimphlapibul noted the significance of local execution, adding, "However, the actual outcome will depend on operator readiness and investor response."

Prospective fund promoters must prepare independent administrative paperwork, obtain clearance for individual product prospectuses, and coordinate with the SET prior to any public listing. The SEC emphasized that general regulatory permission does not waive standard scrutiny for new investment funds.

Investor Protection Rules for Crypto ETFs

Under the regulatory standards, brokers must provide comprehensive disclosures explaining the structural features and volatile characteristics of digital assets to prospective buyers. Securities firms are legally required to obtain explicit confirmation from clients verifying that they comprehend the risks before executing any purchase of crypto ETFs.

The debut of the ETF channel coincides with changing domestic participation trends. According to 99Bitcoins citing official SEC data, active trading accounts across Thai digital asset exchanges dropped to 121,000 in July 2026, marking a 21.82% slide from June and a sharp drop from roughly 265,000 active accounts documented in 2024.

The mandate for formal risk acknowledgments applies uniformly across all authorized brokerages distributing the vehicles. By barring margin facilities and enforcing mandatory disclosure checkpoints, the regulator seeks to curb reckless retail speculation while still establishing an accessible route to regulated digital asset exposure.

Conclusion

The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission's regulatory package establishes the formal legal foundation for spot bitcoin and ether funds to trade on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. With the 11 notifications taking effect on Oct. 16, 2026, the next concrete step requires local asset managers to prepare organizational infrastructure, submit fund applications for SEC review, and secure formal listing clearance before any products can launch.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do the Thailand SEC crypto ETF rules take effect?

The regulatory framework takes effect on Oct. 16, 2026. The Thai SEC released 11 notifications on Oct. 8 finalizing the legal guidelines for fund establishment, though individual products still require explicit regulatory clearance before listing.

Which digital assets are permitted under the framework?

The initial phase of the framework permits exchange-traded funds to track only bitcoin and ether. All qualifying funds must be listed and traded exclusively on the Stock Exchange of Thailand.

Are Thai retail investors allowed to purchase foreign crypto ETFs?

No. Under the SEC rules, Thai brokerages remain barred from facilitating investments in foreign crypto ETFs for retail clients. Offshore products are restricted exclusively to institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors.

Can investors trade crypto ETFs using margin loans?

No. The SEC has explicitly prohibited securities firms and brokers from issuing margin loans to clients for purchasing crypto ETFs, keeping leverage curbs aligned with existing rules for direct digital asset acquisitions.

Sources

Crypto Industry Urged to Cement Institutional Adoption to Protect Market

Crypto Industry Urged to Cement Institutional Adoption to Protect Market

The cryptocurrency sector must accelerate institutional adoption under the current administrative climate to protect its market progress from potential future policy changes, Canton and Digital Asset chief executive Yuval Rooz said, according to Cointelegraph.

Rooz argued that securing deep institutional adoption across corporate and financial systems creates operational inertia, making it significantly harder for upcoming governments to dismantle the sector's regulatory and commercial inroads, Cointelegraph reported.

According to Cointelegraph, Rooz maintained that the prevailing operating climate presents a rare window of opportunity that market participants must exploit to broaden institutional adoption. He asserted that if decentralized technology networks achieve high degrees of operational integration across traditional entities today, the fundamental advances made by digital asset firms will prove far more resilient against any prospective hostile policy pivots enacted down the line.

Comparing Institutional Adoption to Tech Platforms

Drawing historical parallels during his remarks, Rooz likened the current window for digital asset integration to the early market growth seen by technology platforms Uber and Airbnb, according to Cointelegraph.

Rooz explained that both platform services achieved broad consumer integration before government authorities could mobilize coordinated restrictions. Speaking on their rollout, Rooz noted, "By the time people got their act together and decided, OK, we wanna legislate against those companies, it was too late," according to Cointelegraph.

In a similar manner, widespread institutional adoption of distributed ledger tools could establish structural staying power that shields the underlying sector from reactionary legal constraints, Rooz stated.

According to Cointelegraph, Rooz pointed out that the speed with which Uber and Airbnb integrated themselves into day-to-day operations outpaced the ability of administrative bodies to impose stifling rules. He contended that the digital asset industry must follow this exact playbook, locking in widespread institutional adoption across core commercial sectors before legal roadblocks can take root.

Long-Term Policy Horizons and 2028 Elections

Addressing delegates at the Token2049 conference in Singapore, Rooz urged industry participants to make shared networks indispensable before November 2028, when the subsequent presidential vote takes place in the US, Cointelegraph reported.

A shift in executive power during that electoral cycle could alter federal enforcement strategies and regulatory mandates across agencies, according to Cointelegraph.

Rooz stated that the digital asset market should expand institutional adoption so comprehensively across operations that regardless of what administrative changes take place in 2028, there is no path backward for regulators.

Rooz emphasized during the Singapore conference that the looming November 2028 timeline leaves the sector a defined window to solidify its presence across institutional networks, according to Cointelegraph. He reiterated that securing widespread blockchain integration prior to any administration change will effectively neutralize efforts to unwind current structural momentum.

According to Cointelegraph, Rooz stressed that the scheduled November election creates a specific target date for industry leaders seeking to establish durable infrastructure. He maintained that achieving deep integration before any leadership transition occurs will make existing decentralized operational structures far too entrenched for incoming officials to reverse.

Debate Over the CLARITY Act and Legislation

The prospect of political backtracking drew attention from other prominent executives participating in the Token2049 discussion panel, Cointelegraph reported.

Binance co-CEO Richard Teng told attendees that the primary risk confronting the sector is an undoing of recent progress, according to Cointelegraph.

Teng stated that he hopes the CLARITY Act will ultimately pass into law, explaining that concrete legislative guardrails would stop administrative reversals while instilling confidence in institutional adoption across major capital allocators.

According to Cointelegraph, Teng made clear that legal statutes offer the strongest protective barrier against future political volatility. By codifying operating parameters via the CLARITY Act, Teng argued that lawmakers could eliminate regulatory backtracking and provide institutional market participants with the long-term assurances required to commit capital.

Teng noted that clear congressional mandates would create an environment where institutional adoption can thrive without participants fearing unexpected administrative shifts, Cointelegraph reported. He emphasized that establishing formal legal certainty remains crucial for institutional players considering entry into the market.

Regulatory Actions and Alternative Perspectives

Offering a contrasting perspective on the same panel, Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson cautioned that businesses should not anchor their operational strategy purely on the passage of the CLARITY Act, according to Cointelegraph.

While acknowledging that federal statutes would deliver legal clarity, Johnson observed that existing agency efforts are already laying groundwork for the industry, Cointelegraph reported.

Johnson noted that the SEC and CFTC are active in establishing frameworks, which she said permits digital asset innovation and institutional adoption to advance without statutory delays.

According to Cointelegraph, Johnson suggested that relying exclusively on congressional action could stall momentum when functional progress is already happening. With the SEC and CFTC working to deliver clear parameters, Johnson maintained that the market has sufficient latitude to press forward with institutional adoption and technological development.

Conclusion

Industry executives at Token2049 diverged on whether federal statutory measures or agency rules should guide the market, but agreed that establishing deep integration remains a primary operational shield. As the sector targets expansion, leadership will monitor legislative debates surrounding the CLARITY Act alongside agency guidelines ahead of the November 2028 election cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Yuval Rooz say about institutional adoption?

Digital Asset co-founder and Canton CEO Yuval Rooz told Token2049 attendees that the crypto sector must fast-track institutional adoption under current market conditions. He argued that widespread reliance on blockchain tools would make it difficult for future presidential administrations to dismantle the industry's gains, according to Cointelegraph.

Why did Yuval Rooz compare blockchain to Uber and Airbnb?

According to Cointelegraph, Rooz noted that Uber and Airbnb achieved consumer integration before regulators established rules against them. He argued that if digital networks achieve similar entrenched adoption, government authorities will find it too late to enact broad policy rollbacks.

What is Binance co-CEO Richard Teng's stance on the CLARITY Act?

Richard Teng expressed hope that the CLARITY Act will be enacted into law, Cointelegraph reported. Teng characterized the reversal of existing progress as the market's biggest fear, stating that statutory rules would prevent administrative backpedaling and encourage institutional participation.

How does Franklin Templeton view current regulatory efforts?

Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson stated the industry should not depend entirely on the passage of the CLARITY Act, according to Cointelegraph. Johnson pointed out that ongoing initiatives by the SEC and CFTC are actively delivering clarity, enabling ongoing innovation.

Sources

Read Also