Starknet ShapeShift Integration Cuts Bridge Step From Cross-Chain Swaps

Starknet ShapeShift Integration Cuts Bridge Step From Cross-Chain Swaps

ShapeShift has integrated Starknet, allowing users of the multichain swap aggregator to trade assets on the Ethereum Layer 2 network in a single transaction without a separate bridging step. ShapeShift announced the integration on October 16, 2026, and Starknet amplified the news a day later, describing the network as now available on the platform, according to Crypto Briefing.

The change matters because moving value into or out of Starknet through a typical route previously required two distinct actions: bridging assets first, then executing a swap. The Starknet ShapeShift integration collapses that into one trade, reducing the steps and overhead involved in accessing the network. For a Layer 2 competing for users, that kind of friction reduction is a practical gain rather than a cosmetic one.

How the Starknet ShapeShift integration works

ShapeShift operates as a community-led multichain swap aggregator. Rather than holding all liquidity itself, an aggregator searches across sources to find a route for a trade. With the new integration, that routing now extends to Starknet, so a user can complete a trade in one swap with no bridge step, Crypto Briefing reported.

Getting the network live on the platform required changes on ShapeShift's side. The company adjusted its technical configurations so its systems could support the new network, according to Crypto Briefing. ShapeShift already supports multiple chains and has recently leaned further into interoperability, so Starknet slots into an existing multichain framework rather than a new one built from scratch.

ShapeShift did not disclose which tokens or trading pairs are part of the launch, and it provided no volume or usage figures alongside the announcement. That leaves the scope of day-one support unclear, even though the core mechanism, a single swap replacing a bridge-plus-swap sequence, is confirmed. The absence of named pairs also means traders cannot yet tell from the announcement alone how deep the initial coverage runs.

Why one-swap access matters for Starknet

Starknet operates as a scaling layer for Ethereum and is built on zk-STARK technology, according to Crypto Briefing. Networks of this type handle transactions away from Ethereum's main chain and then settle them back to it, an approach aimed at cutting costs and increasing throughput for users.

The network has framed its development around three goals: scalability, privacy, and interoperability. Of those, the ShapeShift deal speaks most directly to interoperability, Crypto Briefing reported. Ease of moving funds in and out is one of the axes on which Layer 2 networks compete, and connecting to an established multichain aggregator exposes Starknet to users who might never have sought it out on their own.

For existing ShapeShift users, the effect is simple: Starknet now appears alongside the other chains the platform already supports, as one more destination rather than a separate system requiring extra steps. Because each trade no longer carries the overhead of a bridge transaction, the change could make smaller and more frequent transactions more practical, Crypto Briefing reported. ShapeShift's platform could also see higher trading volume as a result, while Starknet stands to gain in user engagement.

Developer widget could extend the reach

A month before the Starknet announcement, in September 2026, ShapeShift made its swap stack available to developers as a free widget and API. That decision matters for this integration because any chain ShapeShift adds can potentially reach users well beyond ShapeShift's own interface if outside developers build the tooling into their own applications.

That dynamic gives the Starknet ShapeShift integration a second potential distribution channel. Whether developers actually take it up remains to be demonstrated in live products, but the pathway is now open in a way it was not before the September release. The combination of a multichain front end and an embeddable swap stack means a single chain addition can propagate across many interfaces at once.

What to watch next

For traders and investors watching Starknet, the practical signals to monitor are straightforward, according to Crypto Briefing. One is whether Starknet swaps begin appearing inside third-party products built on ShapeShift's free widget and API, which would be the clearest sign the integration is spreading beyond a single front end.

The other open question is which assets and pairs attract real use once the initial novelty fades. Because the announcement left those specifics out, the more useful story will come from how trading actually behaves over the coming weeks, Crypto Briefing reported.

Conclusion

ShapeShift's integration of Starknet, announced on October 16, 2026, lets users trade the Layer 2 network's assets in a single swap without a separate bridging step. The move aligns with Starknet's interoperability priority and puts the network in front of ShapeShift's existing multichain user base. The next concrete signals to watch are whether developers using ShapeShift's free widget and API surface Starknet swaps in their own products, and which assets and pairs attract real trading volume in the coming weeks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did ShapeShift announce about Starknet on October 16, 2026?

ShapeShift announced that it had integrated Starknet, letting users of its multichain swap aggregator trade Starknet assets in a single swap with no separate bridging step. A day later, on October 17, 2026, Starknet amplified the announcement and described the network as now available on the platform, according to Crypto Briefing.

How did users move value into Starknet before the ShapeShift integration?

Previously, a typical route into or out of Starknet involved two distinct actions: users had to bridge assets first and then execute a swap. ShapeShift now handles the process as a single trade, according to Crypto Briefing.

What is Starknet?

Starknet is a Layer 2 network built to scale Ethereum, using zk-STARK technology. Networks of this kind handle transactions away from Ethereum's main chain and settle them back to it, aiming for lower costs and higher throughput. Starknet has positioned itself around scalability, privacy, and interoperability.

Which tokens and trading pairs are included in the Starknet ShapeShift launch?

The announcement did not name specific tokens or trading pairs included in the launch, and it did not include any volume or usage figures, according to Crypto Briefing. Actual trading behavior over the coming weeks will show which assets and pairs see real use.

How could ShapeShift's developer widget affect Starknet's reach?

In September 2026, ShapeShift released its swap stack as a free widget and API for developers. If developers embed that tooling in their own apps, Starknet swaps could potentially travel further than ShapeShift's own interface, according to Crypto Briefing.

Sources

Bitcoin Tests $82,000 This Weekend as Traders Weigh Inflation Shock and Key Support Levels

Bitcoin Tests $82,000 This Weekend as Traders Weigh Inflation Shock and Key Support Levels

Bitcoin traded just below $82,000 on Saturday, October 17, 2026, after a volatile week that saw the largest cryptocurrency briefly fall under $80,000 before rebounding. CoinGecko data showed BTC near $81,596 at 07:53 UTC, down 0.72% over 24 hours, leaving the coin roughly 0.50% away from reclaiming the $82,000 threshold, according to the Bitcoin Foundation.

The proximity to $82,000 matters less for the round number itself than for what a sustained move above or below it would signal. As the Bitcoin Foundation noted, reclaiming the level is one thing and holding it is another, and a brief pop above the threshold would say little about whether the market's direction has actually changed.

Bitcoin Tests $82,000 After Inflation-Driven Selloff

The week's turbulence began with U.S. economic data that rattled risk assets. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the September Producer Price Index rose 1.3% month-over-month, the largest increase since March 2022, and advanced 6.3% year-over-year, according to TradingKey. U.S. retail sales grew 0.8% month-over-month in September, beating expectations of 0.3%.

Separately, FX Empire reported that core inflation rose 0.3% in September, exceeding forecasts by 10 basis points, while the annualized Consumer Price Index hit 3.7%, up 30 basis points from the previous month. The data triggered a sharp selloff that liquidated nearly $1 billion in long futures positions, with $1.7 billion in bullish positions wiped out over four days, FX Empire reported.

On October 15, the price dipped to around $79,700, its weakest point in almost four weeks, before swiftly recovering back above $82,000, according to TradingKey. The odds of a Federal Reserve rate hike in October jumped from 22% to nearly 50% after the inflation report, though they later fell back to 29%, FX Empire reported.

Liquidations and Short Covering Drove the Bounce

When the price slid to around $79,800 on Thursday, roughly $930 million in leveraged positions were liquidated, approximately $780 million of which were long positions, according to 99Bitcoins. As the market recovered, about $53 million in short positions were also wiped out.

That second figure carries a caveat. While short covering can push prices higher in a hurry, it involves closing out existing bets rather than generating fresh buying interest, meaning part of this week's recovery came from market mechanics rather than new demand, 99Bitcoins noted. Volume fell 23.87% to $30.98 billion while price recovered, indicating the bounce arrived on lighter participation than the decline that caused it.

A dense cluster of buy orders had been sitting at the $80,000 mark through much of last week, according to Glassnode's heatmap data cited by 99Bitcoins. Thursday's decline absorbed those orders, and the new stack of bids that formed underneath was thinner than what had been there before.

Technical Levels Define the Range

Bitcoin continues to trade within an $82,500 to $86,500 range, but recent price action suggests buyers are struggling to regain control, according to Brave New Coin. A technical analysis published by TradingView contributor inchartswetrust found that sellers have pushed BTC back from $84,000 on seven occasions since Sunday, blocking any sustained advance toward the top of the range.

The repeated rejections matter because $84,000 represents the midpoint of the current trading range. Earlier rally attempts on October 8 and October 13 also faded as they approached that same barrier, Brave New Coin reported. A move back above $84,000 would offer an early sign that buying pressure is strengthening; until then, Bitcoin remains exposed to another test of the lower end of its range.

On the support side, the 200-period exponential moving average on the four-hour chart has turned back two earlier breakdown attempts, suggesting buyers remain active during short-term declines, according to the same analysis. Still, each retest of that floor raises the risk that the market gives way if buying interest fades.

Riya Sehgal, a research analyst at Delta Exchange, identified the zone between $80,000 and $80,700 as the critical support area, with a sustained break beneath it exposing $78,000 to $79,500, according to 99Bitcoins. Reclaiming $82,000 to $83,200 would improve the short-term structure, Sehgal said.

On-Chain Data Shows ETF Cost Basis as Key Threshold

Glassnode has identified the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF investor cost basis near $81,500 as an important market threshold, according to Brave New Coin. The price has bounced off that mark on two occasions this year, turning it into a reference point traders watch closely when gauging demand from ETF investors.

Should the price drop under $81,500 without recovering, attention would shift to Glassnode's True Market Mean near $77,500 as the next significant on-chain support, Brave New Coin reported. Meanwhile, distribution from wallets holding coins for one to two years has slowed considerably, which could reduce one source of selling pressure in the market.

Whale accumulation has picked up sharply since September, with CryptoQuant's tally of total whale holdings, which strips out exchange and mining pool wallets, now approaching three million BTC, close to its highest reading of 2026, according to 99Bitcoins.

Longer-Term Outlook Remains Bullish for Some

Despite the near-term uncertainty, some market participants see the current consolidation as a pause within a larger upward trend. James Thorne, chief market strategist at Wellington-Altus Private Wealth, said Bitcoin is entering a generational supercycle rather than just another bull run, according to Coinpedia.

"The next run in Bitcoin is going to be one for the ages," Thorne said. He compared the current moment to the commodities supercycle that followed China's entry into the World Trade Organization, arguing that the GENIUS Act, stablecoins and tokenization are shifting the global financial system onto blockchain rails.

"It's no longer this libertarian point of view," Thorne said, describing the shift as crypto going mainstream. He recommended investors hold 3% to 5% of their portfolios in Bitcoin or Ethereum and declared the halving-driven four-year cycle finished.

A separate bullish scenario cited by Markets Insider projects Bitcoin reaching $175,000 in a multi-quarter outlook built around stronger institutional ownership, bank-backed crypto financing and wider digital-asset adoption.

Conclusion

Bitcoin enters the weekend sitting just below $82,000, a level that has served as both support and resistance for close to 50 days, according to Pi42 co-founder and CEO Avinash Shekhar. Whether the coin can reclaim and hold that threshold will shape the near-term outlook, with the Bitcoin Foundation noting that a stronger bullish signal would be repeated trading above $82,000 followed by further gains, while repeated failure to hold the level would leave the market open to fresh selling.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Bitcoin price on Saturday, October 17, 2026?

Bitcoin traded near $81,596 at 07:53 UTC on Saturday, down 0.72% over 24 hours, according to CoinGecko data cited by the Bitcoin Foundation. The price sat roughly 0.50% below the $82,000 threshold.

Why did Bitcoin fall below $80,000 this week?

Bitcoin dropped after U.S. data showed September PPI rose 1.3% month-over-month, the largest increase since March 2022, and retail sales beat expectations. The hot inflation print raised fears of a Federal Reserve rate hike and triggered nearly $1 billion in long liquidations.

What are the key support and resistance levels for Bitcoin right now?

Delta Exchange analyst Riya Sehgal identified critical support at $80,000 to $80,700, with a break below exposing $78,000 to $79,500. Resistance sits at $84,000, which BTC has failed to break seven times since Sunday, according to a TradingView analysis.

What is the $175,000 Bitcoin price prediction?

A bullish multi-quarter scenario cited by Markets Insider projects Bitcoin reaching $175,000, built around stronger institutional ownership, bank-backed crypto financing and wider digital-asset adoption. Separately, Wellington-Altus strategist James Thorne said Bitcoin is entering a generational supercycle.

What role does the $81,500 ETF cost basis play for Bitcoin?

Glassnode identified the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF investor cost basis near $81,500 as a key threshold. BTC has rebounded from this level twice in 2026. If it falls below and fails to recover, the next major on-chain support is Glassnode's True Market Mean near $77,500.

Sources

Ethereum Price Sweeps Lows Near $2.3K, Rebounds to $2.4K as Momentum Improves

Ethereum Price Sweeps Lows Near $2.3K, Rebounds to $2.4K as Momentum Improves

Ethereum price staged a recovery on Saturday, bouncing back from an intraday low of $2,324 to trade at $2,483, a gain of 3.3%. The rebound followed a low sweep that took out stop-losses below $2,350 and triggered $93.31 million in liquidations over 24 hours, according to CryptoRank.

The move matters because the quick reclaim of lost ground suggests the dip may have been a liquidity sweep rather than genuine selling pressure, though technical indicators paint a mixed picture. Trading volume settled at $14.28 billion as buyers stepped in to defend the $2.4K area.

Ethereum Price Action and Key Levels

The largest altcoin dipped as low as $2,324 during the session before recovering, with the price now back above the $2,440 area. CryptoRank reported that a former resistance zone now acts as support, while an ascending trendline continues to prop up the price from underneath, and a possible bullish divergence is forming on the charts.

Key levels to watch include resistance near $2,500 and support around $2,300. If momentum carries the Ethereum price toward the $2,500 resistance, a break higher could trigger a golden cross formation and potentially send the asset above $2,584, according to CryptoRank's analysis.

On the downside, if bears enter the market, immediate support might be found around $2,300. A deeper correction could produce a death cross and drive the price lower, CryptoRank reported.

Momentum Indicators Show Mixed Signals

The four-hour chart shows the Moving Average Convergence Divergence line crossing above the signal line, indicating that short-term buying momentum is accelerating. However, both lines remain below the zero line, which signals a bullish momentum shift within a larger downtrend, according to CryptoRank.

Market participants treat this setup as a preliminary indication to get ready for a potential buy signal, holding off until the lines move above the zero line to verify an uptrend. The daily Relative Strength Index reading at 50.64 suggests a neutral, balanced market with no strong directional bias, with buyers and sellers in equal strength at the 50 mark.

The asset sits between the extreme thresholds, with above 70 considered overbought and below 30 oversold. A push past 55 would indicate that bullish momentum is gaining control, whereas a decline under 45 points to mounting bearish pressure, according to CryptoRank. The Ethereum price appears to be consolidating or waiting for a catalyst.

Demand Zone and Channel Structure

On the daily timeframe, Ethereum continues to trade within an ascending channel that has guided its recovery from June lows near $1.5K, CryptoPotato reported. A strong rally in August lifted ETH from around $1.9K up to $2.5K, and the advance later extended into the $2.8K supply zone in late September, where sellers defended that region.

The pullback has since dragged ETH down to the marked $2.4K demand zone, an area that coincides with the channel's ascending lower boundary. Prices briefly dipped beneath the zone toward roughly $2.3K before buyers intervened, and recent daily candles reflect a modest rebound back above $2.4K, according to CryptoPotato.

If buyers continue to defend this support, ETH could attempt another move toward the channel midpoint near $2.8K, bringing the $2.8K to $3K supply zone back into focus. On the other hand, a firm daily close beneath $2.3K would constitute a breakdown from both the demand zone and the channel itself, with the next major support at the $1.9K order block, CryptoPotato reported.

Four-Hour Structure and Liquidity Sweep

The four-hour chart shows Ethereum trading within a broadening ascending structure since late August. Once the price tagged the structure's upper edge near $2.8K in September, momentum faded and ETH moved sideways in a range of roughly $2.6K to $2.8K before breaking down in early October, according to CryptoPotato.

The decline produced a series of lower highs, and the mid-October rebound stalled around $2.5K. The latest sell-off pushed ETH below the wedge's lower trendline and through the $2.4K demand zone, briefly reaching the $2.3K area, but the price quickly recovered back above both the zone and the trendline, suggesting the move may have been a liquidity sweep rather than a confirmed breakdown, CryptoPotato reported.

Holding above $2.4K would support the stabilization attempt and could open the way toward the $2.6K rebound high. Clearing that barrier would interrupt the sequence of lower highs and potentially bring the $2.7K region back into play. On the downside, a renewed loss of the trendline and a four-hour close beneath $2.3K would invalidate the recent recovery, according to CryptoPotato.

US Demand Remains Weak

The Coinbase Premium Index, which measures the percentage difference between the ETH price on Coinbase Pro and Binance, has dropped to its deepest negative reading in months, suggesting US-based demand remains weak despite the latest bounce, CryptoPotato reported. Positive readings indicate stronger buying pressure from US-based participants, while negative readings suggest relatively weaker demand.

The premium remained largely positive between August and October 2025, when ETH traded above $4K, then turned persistently negative from November 2025 onward. The index briefly returned to slightly positive territory in late August and early September during the rally toward $2.8K, but readings have since moved back into negative territory and recently fell to approximately -0.1, the lowest level since the summer, according to CryptoPotato.

A sustained negative premium indicates that US spot buyers are not currently leading the market, though this does not necessarily mean the recent bounce will fail, as price can recover through offshore demand or derivatives activity. If the premium remains weak while ETH struggles to reclaim $2.6K, the $2.4K support zone could come under pressure again, whereas a recovery back toward zero would strengthen the case for a durable base, CryptoPotato reported.

Conclusion

Ethereum price has recovered from a low sweep to $2,324 to trade near $2,483, with technical indicators showing improving short-term momentum but an uncertain broader direction. The market sits at a short-term inflection point, with the reaction around $2.4K likely to shape the next move. Traders are watching whether ETH can hold above $2.4K and reclaim $2.6K, or whether a close below $2.3K would expose the asset to further selling pressure toward $1.9K.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused Ethereum's price to drop to $2,324?

Ethereum dipped to $2,324 during a low sweep that took out stop-losses sitting below $2,350, triggering $93.31 million in liquidations over 24 hours, according to CryptoRank. The price quickly recovered to $2,483, suggesting the move may have been a liquidity sweep rather than confirmed selling pressure.

What are the key support and resistance levels for Ethereum price?

Key resistance sits near $2,500, with a break higher potentially targeting $2,584 and beyond. Immediate support is around $2,300, and a decisive close below that level could expose Ethereum to further declines toward the $1.9K order block, according to CryptoRank and CryptoPotato.

What does the MACD indicator show for Ethereum?

The four-hour MACD line has crossed above the signal line, indicating accelerating short-term buying momentum. However, both lines remain below the zero line, signaling a bullish shift within a larger downtrend. Traders view this as an early buy signal, waiting for a cross above zero to confirm an uptrend, according to CryptoRank.

Why is the Coinbase Premium Index important for Ethereum?

The index measures the price difference between Coinbase Pro and Binance, indicating US-based demand. It recently fell to approximately -0.1, the lowest since summer, suggesting weak US spot buying. A sustained negative premium means US buyers are not leading the market, though price can still recover through offshore demand, according to CryptoPotato.

What happens if Ethereum breaks above $2.6K?

Clearing $2.6K would interrupt the sequence of lower highs and potentially bring the $2.7K region back into play, where earlier consolidation broke down. A sustained move higher could target the channel midpoint near $2.8K and bring the $2.8K to $3K supply zone back into focus, according to CryptoPotato.

Sources

Bitcoiners Launch ‘The Bitcoin Evidence Base’ to Stamp Out FUD

Bitcoiners Launch ‘The Bitcoin Evidence Base’ to Stamp Out FUD

A group of Bitcoin advocates has rolled out a new open-source artificial intelligence tool that produces research-backed answers to frequent misunderstandings about Bitcoin, covering topics such as its environmental footprint, power consumption and position within global finance. The initiative, named The Bitcoin Evidence Base, comes from Bitcoin Beyond 66, a Nordic-based education platform focused on the cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin Beyond 66 said it created the tool because, although a growing volume of peer-reviewed studies points to environmental advantages from Bitcoin mining, public opinion is still being shaped by outdated data, methodologically weak studies, or plain lack of knowledge. The Bitcoin Evidence Base draws on more than 22 peer-reviewed research papers to tackle the most common misconceptions about Bitcoin.

How the Bitcoin Evidence Base Works

Users interact with The Bitcoin Evidence Base by submitting criticisms of Bitcoin, either as written text or as links, and the system replies with responses grounded in documented research. The goal is to give people fast access to relevant, evidence-based information about Bitcoin mining and related subjects, which they can then pass along to individuals on social platforms who have shared inaccurate claims about the cryptocurrency, whether deliberately or by mistake.

The platform framed the tool as a time-saving resource, observing that most people cannot realistically work through more than 22 peer-reviewed papers, Cambridge reports and ERCOT data on their own. To suit different situations, the database lets users choose among three tones for their replies to criticism: direct, balanced and soft.

The project is also designed to grow over time. Members of the public can contribute by sending research papers and website links to Bitcoin Beyond 66, which reviews the material before deciding whether to add it to the database.

Cambridge Study and Renewable Energy

In testing the tool, Cointelegraph found that it frequently references an April 2025 study from the University of Cambridge, which concluded that over 52% of Bitcoin is now mined using renewable energy sources. The database further notes that Bitcoin's renewable energy mix exceeds that of the banking sector, and that more than 22 peer-reviewed studies have documented environmental benefits tied to Bitcoin.

Debate over the environmental consequences of Bitcoin mining has raged for more than ten years, with some members of the United Nations and various governments raising concerns that the activity contributes to global warming. Bitcoin environmentalists such as Daniel Batten counter that mining now relies on a much larger share of lower-carbon and renewable energy sources, which in their view renders many of the older narratives outdated.

Communication Playbook

According to Bitcoin Beyond 66, the AI-powered database applies Batten's Bitcoin communication playbook, an approach built around countering misinformation with evidence and empathy. The method involves first acknowledging whatever was accurate in a given criticism, then correcting the misconceptions in a way intended to educate both the individual and the wider public, rather than trying to score a debate victory.

The Nordic-based group warned against a combative approach, saying that if you're trying to 'own' someone, you'll trigger their defenses and accomplish nothing.

Conclusion

The Bitcoin Evidence Base marks a fresh attempt by Bitcoin supporters to push back against misinformation about the cryptocurrency's environmental record. By combining AI with peer-reviewed research, the tool gives users rapid, sourced answers to familiar criticisms, and its creators are betting that education delivered with empathy will do more to shift public perception than confrontation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Bitcoin Evidence Base?

The Bitcoin Evidence Base is an open-source AI tool launched by Bitcoin Beyond 66 that generates evidence-based responses to misconceptions about Bitcoin's environmental impact, energy use and its role in the financial system.

How many peer-reviewed papers does the tool cite?

The Bitcoin Evidence Base cites over 22 peer-reviewed research papers to address common misconceptions about Bitcoin.

What does the Cambridge study cited by the tool say?

The April 2025 University of Cambridge study found that more than 52% of Bitcoin is now mined using renewable energy sources.

How can users contribute to the database?

Users can help build the database by sharing papers and website links with Bitcoin Beyond 66 for review before inclusion.

What communication strategy does the tool use?

The tool implements Daniel Batten's Bitcoin communication playbook, which focuses on countering misinformation with evidence and empathy rather than seeking to win debates.

Sources

California Billionaires Raise $300M to Fight Proposition 40 Wealth Tax

California Billionaires Raise $300M to Fight Proposition 40 Wealth Tax

California billionaires are intensifying efforts to defeat Proposition 40, a proposed wealth tax targeting the state's billionaires, ahead of the November 3, 2026 election. Notable figures such as Google co-founder Sergey Brin, venture capitalist John Doerr, and Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen have collectively raised over $300 million in opposition to the measure.

The increased funding suggests stronger opposition to Proposition 40, and market pricing implies a decreased likelihood of the wealth tax passing. Support for the measure has declined in recent polling, consistent with the stepped-up opposition efforts.

Proposition 40 wealth tax details

Proposition 40 is a one-time, 5% levy on the state's more than 200 billionaires, proposed by SEIU United Healthcare Workers West last year to address lost revenue from federal cuts, with 90% of the dollars raised going to healthcare and 10% to food assistance or education-related programs, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune. The tax would apply to individuals with more than $1 billion in net worth who were California residents as of January 1, 2026, with real estate and some pensions and retirement accounts excluded.

Those subject to the tax could pay it in full in 2027 or make annual payments over five years with added interest, the Union-Tribune reported. Proponents claim it will raise $100 billion, while the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office estimates the yield at tens of billions of dollars but said it could reduce ongoing state income tax revenues by less than $1 billion per year if billionaires leave.

The measure's backers say the tax is necessary to prevent hospitals and clinics from closing and low-income residents from losing Medi-Cal coverage, while critics argue it will drive wealthy residents out of the state and inflict long-term damage to the economy, according to the Union-Tribune. California could lose at least $30 billion in annual federal funding as a result of President Donald Trump's spending bill, according to the California Budget and Policy Center.

Billionaire opposition to Proposition 40

Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are among the billionaires who moved out of California last year as talk of the wealth tax grew, the Union-Tribune reported. Brin has shelled out more than $100 million to Building a Better California, a newly formed group opposing Proposition 40.

Larsen has been particularly vocal, contributing significantly to campaigns opposing the tax and supporting initiatives that could nullify it, according to Crypto Briefing. The initiative has roiled California politics for months, dividing state leaders and labor unions, the Union-Tribune reported.

Governor Gavin Newsom, who opposes the measure and is eyeing a potential presidential bid, recently called for a national wealth tax instead. "Wealth is movable, and it shops for the state with the lowest taxes," Newsom wrote in a June Substack post, adding that "the fight belongs at the federal level, where this broken system was created in the first place."

Competing measures could void Proposition 40

Even if voters approve Proposition 40, the tax may not take effect. Propositions 41 and 42, which appear on the same ballot, each contain provisions that would void Proposition 40 if either receives more affirmative votes, according to JD Supra.

Proposition 41 would require the state auditor to review proposed special taxes before they go to voters and invalidate taxes that do not comply with the state spending limit, while Proposition 42 would prohibit new state personal property taxes, the Union-Tribune reported. Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego, said the situation poses a "triple challenge" for proponents.

"They don't know where the end zone is," Kousser said. "They're going to have to both make an argument for a wealth tax that has split the progressive coalition, but also make an argument against two other initiatives that may be appealing to voters who see them probably for the first time when they open their ballots."

Supporters and opponents make their case

Dave Regan, the president of SEIU United Healthcare Workers West and the architect of the tax, said in an interview that the tax would prevent a "healthcare catastrophe" in California. "We're either going to watch this train wreck or we're going to pass Proposition 40," he said, calling it "a solution to a problem that was put in all of our laps."

Regan argues the tax will give California five years to figure out a long-term solution for healthcare funding and brushed off claims it would push wealthy residents out, calling that a "disingenuous argument." "A one-time tax creates no incentive for billionaires to leave the state and we felt that was important," Regan said.

Opponents argue the money would only temporarily stem the budgetary bleeding. The No on 40 coalition, which includes the California Medical Association, the California Teachers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce and Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, positions the initiative on its website as a flawed, reckless tax, the Union-Tribune reported.

The billionaires tax has been endorsed by Rep. Bernie Sanders, the California Democratic Party and the California Federation of Labor Unions. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has also voiced his support, recently saying he is "perfectly fine" with having to pay more in taxes; Forbes estimates Huang is worth $198 billion.

What comes next for the Proposition 40 wealth tax

A September poll conducted for The San Diego Union-Tribune found the measure drawing more support than opposition from likely voters statewide, but still shy of a majority, with about 48% of respondents saying they would vote for it. The poll had a credibility interval of 4.6 percentage points.

Just over a month before Election Day, Kousser said he expects the three measures will trigger a massive amount of spending that will blanket the airwaves and fill voters' mailboxes. While the opposition, funded largely by billionaires like Brin, will almost certainly outspend the yes campaign, Kousser said it gives supporters an opportunity to make a David-versus-Goliath argument.

The outcome could reverberate long past Election Day. Many of the progressives who've been uneasy about Prop. 40… my hunch is that if this fails in progressive California, it slows down the momentum for this as a policy nationwide, Kousser said, according to the Union-Tribune.

Conclusion

California voters will decide on November 3, 2026 whether to approve the first-in-the-nation wealth tax, but the fate of Proposition 40 will rest not only on a simple majority but on how much support two competing initiatives receive. With billionaires having raised over $300 million in opposition and market pricing implying a decreased likelihood of passage, observers are watching upcoming polls and public statements from key political figures such as Governor Gavin Newsom, who opposes the measure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California Proposition 40?

Proposition 40 is a one-time, 5% wealth tax on California residents with more than $1 billion in net worth as of January 1, 2026. Proposed by SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, it would direct 90% of proceeds to healthcare and 10% to food assistance or education-related programs.

How much have billionaires raised to fight Proposition 40?

Google co-founder Sergey Brin, venture capitalist John Doerr, Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen and others have collectively raised over $300 million in opposition to the measure. Brin alone has contributed more than $100 million to Building a Better California, a newly formed opposition group.

When is the vote on California's Proposition 40 wealth tax?

California voters will decide Proposition 40 on November 3, 2026. Even if approved, the tax may not take effect because Propositions 41 and 42 on the same ballot could void it if either receives more affirmative votes.

How much revenue would the Proposition 40 wealth tax raise?

Proponents claim the tax will raise $100 billion. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office estimates the yield at tens of billions of dollars, but said it could also reduce ongoing state income tax revenues by less than $1 billion per year if billionaires leave California.

Who supports and who opposes California Proposition 40?

The tax is endorsed by Rep. Bernie Sanders, the California Democratic Party, the California Federation of Labor Unions and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. Opponents include Governor Gavin Newsom, the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Medical Association and a billionaire-funded campaign led in part by Sergey Brin.

Sources