Ripple Vs SEC – The legal battle is about to get closed?

Ripple Vs SEC – The legal battle is about to get closed?

It’s possible that the legal battle between Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has been going on since 2020 and will serve as a model for the cryptocurrency sector, will soon be over. The SEC and Ripple Labs, the company behind ripple (XRP), have both filed motions for summary judgment.

In December 2020, a day before former SEC Chair Jay Clayton resigned, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and its Chairman Chris Larsen, alleging that the company had raised over $1.3 billion through unregistered XRP sales. Over the past two years, the parties have filed a number of discovery motions without actually litigating the underlying issue of whether Ripple violated securities law by selling XRP. The motions for summary actually mean that both parties are asking the court to really conclude whether either the SEC or Ripple has sufficiently given enough proofs to demonstrate somehow whether there was an infringement.

About Ripple:

Ripple, a blockchain-based alternative to SWIFT, the global interbank messaging system that facilitates daily payments totaling trillions of dollars, was established in 2012. Banks and fintech companies buy software from the company. Additionally, Ripple makes use of XRP, the sixth-largest cryptocurrency in terms of market value, to facilitate international trade. The majority of the 100 billion XRP tokens in circulation are owned by the company, which periodically releases them from an escrow account to maintain stable prices.

Updates regarding the legal battle:

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s general counsel, tweeted that the company’s response was its final submission. In the filing, the company requested a judgment in its favor, according to him. Alderoty stated that the cryptocurrency company was pleased with the defense it put up for the crypto industry. The SEC has failed to demonstrate the existence of an investment contract as indicated in the redacted court filing from December 2.

According to the company, both Ripple founders had the right to summary judgment regarding their decision to sell on foreign exchanges. The business claims that the SEC was unable to provide any material facts to the contrary.

When Fox Business reported on November 14 that Ripple had reached a settlement agreement with the SEC, there was some confusion. However, a later report by one of its reporters revealed that a Ripple spokesperson had refuted these assertions. Throughout the two-year legal battle, Ripple received significant support from the crypto community. Cryptocurrency businesses like Coinbase and others submitted around a dozen amicus curiae briefs. In addition, approximately 70,000 holders of XRP submitted a brief in support of the business.



There have been a total of six unique individuals that have inquired about the Finance Department. Two different narratives that, at first glance, appear to have nothing in common with one another. One quite horrible precedence to pursue. The safety and security of your personally identifiable information are of the utmost significance. Coinbase has announced that it will be extending financial assistance to the United States Treasury Department to litigate one constitutional dispute. Donations of money will be made to provide this assistance. Four persons have initiated a civil case with the cooperation of a cryptocurrency exchange, which is providing financial aid to the process. The objective of the process is to challenge particular penalties that were imposed on Tornado Cash.


And on September 9th, the Chief of such Securities and Exchange Commission, Gary Gensler, announced the news about how he was vigorously working with Congress to establish measures that would increase bitcoin restrictions. Gensler is the Chief of such Securities and Exchange Commission. Gensler is currently serving as the Chief Executive Officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

However, these two points of view are not at all incompatible with one another and can be discussed together. This chain of events explains why authorities are only responding in a retaliatory manner rather than taking preventative measures to decentralized financial affairs (Defi).

A look at the Tornado Crash

At the beginning of August, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) concluded that Tornado Cash should be subject to sanctions. OFAC accusations say that a blockchain-based blender was used to enable the trafficking of more than seven billion dollars worth of bitcoin from the very beginning of its construction in 2019. This would be in 2019 when the blockchain was first introduced. The amount shows that cyber criminals who claimed to have connections to North Korea as well as the Lazarus Group stole more than $455 million in total.

The Chief Executive Officer of Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, issued a press release in which he argued that the Treasury Department may have exceeded its authority by imposing “the arbitrary decision of banning a broad ecosystem rather than individual officers.” The Treasury Department is responsible for regulating cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and Ethereum. This statement was made by Armstrong at some point during the press release. Coinbase asserted that the remedies, as well as its argument that the penalties were beyond the power allocated to such administration, were in breach of the provisions of the agreement. Coinbase also asserted that the penalties exceeded the power allotted to such administration.

Remove the capacity of customers to protect their private information and security, put innocent bystanders in danger, and prohibit the capability of embedding content.

Regulations imposed on Defi enterprises

The next day, Gensler had a change of heart and decided to discontinue their hunt for stronger regulations governing such Defi enterprises. They did this even though they had previously argued that bitcoin businesses cannot be competitive if they do not have these regulations. Everything that has to do with the cryptocurrency industry is, and will continue to be, in full conformity with the law that regulates the buying and selling of stocks. Regardless of the approaches that are used as a basis, it seems as though one of the most crucial considerations to make is how to safeguard the investment.


There are numerous justifications for exercising caution, including the regulations that govern the security of personal data. However, the threshold that was imposed more by operations targeting Tornado Cash is something that everyone interested in crypto assets has to be concerned about. This is because these activities were the ones that imposed the threshold. In addition to the fact that blockchain technology and cryptology are continuously developing. There is also a wide variety of legitimate applications for technological developments that are comparable to blockchain technology. One example is the use of smart contracts, which are decentralized ledgers that record and verify transactions in a distributed ledger. The provision of security is the most essential and fundamental component of decentralized financial systems. The term “decentralized finance” already provides a fairly accurate description of how the system works.

Please enter CoinGecko Free Api Key to get this plugin works.