Remittix Earn Prepares Up to 22% APY as JPMorgan Forecast Shapes 2026 Investment Debate

Remittix Earn Prepares Up to 22% APY as JPMorgan Forecast Shapes 2026 Investment Debate

Remittix is readying its Earn product with yields reaching as high as 22% APY across chosen ETH, USDT and USDC strategies, according to BTCPressWire News, as the payments-focused project moves toward the November 24, 2026 market debut of its RTX token.

The planned product arrives as investors weigh a new long-range Bitcoin forecast from JPMorgan against yield-bearing alternatives in digital assets. The bank's base case places Bitcoin at 10% annualized returns over the next decade, with a 17% bull case and a negative bear scenario, BTCPressWire News reported.

Remittix Earn and the Yield Pitch

Markets Insider reported that Remittix Earn is set to go live with advertised yields of up to 22% APY on selected crypto assets and stablecoins, with Aave, Fluid and Morpho pools being prepared for the forthcoming platform. Under the planned rollout, eligible users would tap established decentralized lending markets without leaving the environment Remittix is building for crypto-to-bank transfers, wallet access and perpetual trading.

Bringing these pool options into Remittix Earn can broaden the platform beyond simple asset storage, Markets Insider reported. The launch also creates a fresh channel for user engagement in the run-up to the November 24 RTX debut.

BTCPressWire News framed the product within a larger wealth trend, noting that Bitcoin carries a projected long-term return while Remittix aims to bundle multiple income streams and reward RTX holders with an extra APY edge that could lift token demand.

JPMorgan's Bitcoin Forecast in the 2026 Investment Debate

JPMorgan's projection covers a long horizon rather than a single near-term price target. Under the base case, BTC would outpace U.S. large-cap equities by roughly 2.5 percentage points a year and gold by about 4.5 points, according to BTCPressWire News.

The forecast strengthens Bitcoin's portfolio argument, although the return still depends entirely on future price appreciation rather than cash flow paid directly to holders, BTCPressWire News reported. Yield changes that comparison because investors can seek recurring income while retaining exposure to digital assets, and stablecoin-based approaches appeal in particular to users seeking productive capital that does not depend on a volatile token climbing through every market phase.

Regular income can also improve retention during sideways markets, the report said, positioning products such as Remittix Earn as an alternative for investors comparing a forecasted 10% annual Bitcoin return against recurring yield.

Presale Nears $36 Million Hard Cap

The Remittix presale has reached approximately $33 million raised toward a $36 million hard cap, according to BTCPressWire News. Markets Insider reported the funds came from more than 40,000 participants, with RTX still priced at $0.28 ahead of an announced final presale stage of $0.46, which is also the minimum exchange launch price.

Markets Insider reported that roughly $3 million is left before the hard cap, leaving buyers to weigh the $0.28 entry price against the announced $0.46 final stage. The remaining presale allocation represents the final entry window before public trading begins on November 24.

Additional yield is planned for RTX holders, connecting token ownership with higher earning power, BTCPressWire News reported. Users pursuing better rates may buy and retain RTX, linking every new deposit with potential token demand.

How Remittix Earn Fits the Wider Platform

Remittix is primarily a PayFi project designed to connect supported digital assets with conventional banking, Markets Insider reported. Its products include international payment settlement, a mobile wallet, Remittix Markets and the forthcoming Remittix Earn service.

One thousand invited holders can test crypto-to-fiat and fiat-to-crypto transactions through EUR and USD routes using USDT and USDC across Ethereum, Celo, Base and Polygon. The wider ecosystem adds an iOS wallet with more than 10,000 downloads and Remittix Markets, which has processed over $50 million in perpetual trading volume, according to Markets Insider.

Earn introduces a further route for users to enter and remain inside the platform, Markets Insider reported. PayFi provides the real-world payment proposition, the wallet supports onboarding, Markets attracts active traders and Earn is designed to make eligible crypto balances more productive.

Nexo reports more than $7 billion under management, showing that crypto investors will place large balances with platforms combining yield, trading and liquidity, BTCPressWire News reported. Remittix only needs to capture a portion of that demand for Earn to become a major source of recurring platform income, the report said.

Ethereum Finality Work Adds Context

The Remittix Earn preparations come as Ethereum researchers target faster settlement, Markets Insider reported. A proposed decoupled-consensus model would separate head voting from finality voting, potentially reducing the wait for irreversible Ethereum settlement from around 16 minutes to approximately four.

Faster finality could lower capital costs for bridges, exchanges and payment services that currently wait for settlement before releasing funds elsewhere, according to Markets Insider. For Remittix, improvements across Ethereum can also support PayFi and Earn because USDT and USDC on Ethereum already form part of the project's testing environment.

Ethereum bulls argue that faster finality could strengthen the network's position across stablecoins, tokenized assets, bridges and institutional settlement, reviving an ambitious $12,000 ETH target, Markets Insider reported. Ethereum recently traded near $2,396, making that target approximately five times higher.

Conclusion

Remittix is preparing to launch Earn with advertised yields of up to 22% APY on selected ETH, USDT and USDC strategies, built on pools from Aave, Fluid and Morpho, as its presale approaches the $36 million hard cap with roughly $33 million raised. The next concrete step is the November 24, 2026 RTX market debut, with the token still priced at $0.28 ahead of the announced $0.46 final presale stage. The launch lands as JPMorgan's 10% annualized base-case forecast for Bitcoin feeds a wider 2026 debate over how investors balance long-term price appreciation against recurring yield.

Frequently Asked Questions

What yield will Remittix Earn offer on ETH, USDT and USDC?

Remittix Earn is being prepared with selected ETH, USDT and USDC opportunities offering up to 22% APY, according to BTCPressWire News. Markets Insider reported the platform will advertise yields of up to 22% APY on selected crypto assets and stablecoins, with pools supplied by Aave, Fluid and Morpho.

When is the RTX market debut and what is the current presale price?

RTX is scheduled for a November 24, 2026 market debut. The token remains available at $0.28 before progressing toward the announced $0.46 final presale stage and minimum exchange launch price, Markets Insider reported, with approximately $33 million raised toward a $36 million hard cap.

What is JPMorgan's Bitcoin return forecast for the next decade?

JPMorgan's base case places Bitcoin at 10% annualized returns over the next decade, with a 17% bull case and a negative bear scenario, BTCPressWire News reported. The base case would put BTC roughly 2.5 percentage points above U.S. large-cap equities and 4.5 points above gold.

Which DeFi protocols will supply pools for Remittix Earn?

Markets Insider reported that Remittix is preparing Aave, Fluid and Morpho pools for the Earn platform. BTCPressWire News also cited Maple Finance among the planned pool providers. The protocols span decentralized lending, credit and liquidity, giving users access to established on-chain yield markets.

How much has the Remittix presale raised toward its hard cap?

The presale has raised approximately $33 million from more than 40,000 participants toward a $36 million hard cap, Markets Insider reported, leaving about $3 million remaining. BTCPressWire News separately confirmed the roughly $33 million figure.

Sources

Grayscale DeFi Fund Form 144 Filing Reported

Grayscale DeFi Fund Form 144 Filing Reported

A Form 144 notice connected to the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC was reported, according to Investing.com. The item identifies the fund by name and links the filing to the report.

The information currently available is limited to the existence of the notice, the name of the fund and the date attached to it. No further verified details about the filing were included in the material provided.

What the Notice Shows

The reported item concerns the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC and a Form 144 entry. That is the central development confirmed by the source material.

The source headline identifies the fund, the form type and the date, but it does not provide additional transaction details in the facts supplied. As a result, the report cannot go beyond confirming the filing reference itself.

Details Still Limited

No figures, counterparties, share amounts or pricing details were included in the material provided for the Grayscale DeFi Fund filing. The available record also does not include a quoted statement from any company representative or market participant.

Because the only sourced information is the filing headline, any broader interpretation would go beyond the verified record. The confirmed development remains the Form 144 reference tied to the fund.

Why the Filing Matters

For readers tracking fund-related regulatory paperwork, the appearance of a Form 144 notice tied to the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC is the reportable event.

At this stage, the public significance of the filing is limited to the fact that it was reported and attributed to Investing.com. Without more detail in the source material, the story remains a narrow filing notice rather than a broader market development.

What Comes Next

The next concrete step would be the release or confirmation of additional details around the filing beyond the headline itself. Until then, the verified record consists of the fund name and the form type.

Conclusion

The established fact is narrow: a Form 144 notice tied to the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC was reported, according to Investing.com. No additional verified figures or statements were included in the material provided. The next step is any further confirmed detail that expands on the filing beyond the headline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was reported about the Grayscale DeFi Fund?

A Form 144 notice tied to the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC was reported, according to Investing.com. The available material confirms the fund name and the form type, but no additional transaction details.

Which fund is named in the Form 144 report?

The fund named in the report is the Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC. The source material identifies the fund directly and connects it to a Form 144 notice.

Who reported the Form 144 notice?

The Form 144 notice was reported by Investing.com, based on the source material provided. The available record does not include any additional outlet confirmation or company statement.

Are there details on size, price or counterparties in the filing?

No. The material provided does not include figures, pricing, counterparties or any quoted comments. It only supports the fact that a Form 144 notice tied to the fund was reported.

Sources

UK Commits £600 Million to AI Security, Anchored by New Biosecurity Lab

UK Commits £600 Million to AI Security, Anchored by New Biosecurity Lab

The UK government has set out an AI security funding package worth approximately £600 million, or about $800 million, with the largest share directed at defending against biological threats that artificial intelligence could worsen. Reuters reported that the funding, set out on Saturday, October 24, is largely geared toward health and security threats from AI.

The centerpiece of the package is a new AI Biosecurity Lab, described as the world's first organization dedicated to AI biosecurity. The lab is receiving £100 million and sits at the heart of a broader effort to position Britain as a leader in managing AI-related risks to public health, digital infrastructure and the economy.

Biosecurity Lab Leads the AI Security Package

Biosecurity receives the largest themed slice of the AI security funding, at £165 million in total. Of that, £100 million goes to the AI Biosecurity Lab, known as AIBL, while another £65 million is set aside for developing countermeasures against pathogens.

The lab will use artificial intelligence to identify and monitor biological threats. OpenAI and Anthropic are contributing up to £200 million in AI model credits, access to their systems rather than cash, while Google DeepMind and London-based AI life sciences startup Basecamp Research will also provide assistance.

AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said the aim was for the AI Biosecurity Lab to become a major global institution "bringing together world-leading scientific expertise to protect people from emerging biological threats". The BBC noted that full details about the role and remit of the new lab are yet to emerge.

The up to £200 million figure for the OpenAI and Anthropic credits sets a ceiling rather than a guaranteed amount, according to Crypto Briefing. The arrangement shows how government partnerships with AI developers now operate, with the companies offering access to their systems instead of direct funding.

Cyber Defence and the AI Security Institute

The package includes £130 million for two new cyber programmes, the National Cyber Shield and the National Exposure and Real-Time Vulnerability Centre, aimed at improving defences for critical infrastructure and the wider economy. Britain's National Cyber Security Centre will also receive an unspecified sum to expand its operations in Manchester.

A further £120 million goes to the government's existing AI Security Institute, which evaluates the risks of the most advanced AI models and was established by the former Conservative government in 2023. The allocation suggests the government now treats the institute as core infrastructure rather than a pilot, according to Crypto Briefing.

Research, Robotics and Regional Funding

Beyond security, the package spreads across several smaller allocations. A £60 million fund will invest in British companies using AI to advance robotics, autonomous systems and manufacturing, and a further £60 million will support AI research and procurement contracts.

An extra £23 million goes to research on the economic impact of AI, £18 million funds a new chip design academy, and £15 million supports a prize for AI solutions to public policy problems, initially focused on healthcare. Regional mayors will receive £30 million to support local AI initiatives.

Chancellor John Healey said "AI will transform daily life: every firm, community, hospital, school, and every aspect of our economy can benefit," pledging a "distinctively British approach to AI" that does not leave workers behind.

Industry Reaction and Private Sector Context

Jordan Cummins, a director at the CBI, said "The Chancellor is right to put security, resilience and trust at the heart of the UK's approach to AI." The announcement came ahead of the upcoming Budget, with NewsCord reporting the biosecurity lab forms part of Wednesday's Budget plans.

The government commitment follows private sector moves into UK AI safety. Earlier in October 2026, Nvidia committed $250 million to support AI safety research in the UK.

The scale of the spending also points to the resources required to build and secure advanced AI systems, according to StratNews Global. Reuters reported that Anthropic alone recorded more than $12 billion in operating expenses last year.

What the AI Security Funding Depends On

The effectiveness of the UK's funding package will depend on how the initiatives translate into practical threat detection, stronger cyber resilience and deployable security technologies, according to StratNews Global. The package reflects the government's effort to develop AI capabilities while strengthening safeguards against risks to public health, digital infrastructure and the economy.

The announcement builds on earlier work, notably the AI Security Institute formed in 2023, and extends it into biosecurity for the first time at this scale. For cybersecurity firms, the £130 million for national vulnerability and infrastructure programmes is expected to create procurement demand, according to Crypto Briefing.

Conclusion

Britain has committed approximately £600 million, or about $800 million, to AI security, with the new AI Biosecurity Lab receiving £100 million as the package's centerpiece and OpenAI and Anthropic adding up to £200 million in model credits. The funding spans pathogen countermeasures, cyber defence programmes, the AI Security Institute and research into AI's economic impact. The next concrete step is the upcoming Budget, where the biosecurity lab forms part of Wednesday's plans, while full details of the lab's role and remit are still to emerge.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much is the UK spending on AI security and what is the AI Biosecurity Lab?

The UK government has set out approximately £600 million, about $800 million, for AI security, biosecurity research, cyber defence and emerging technologies. The AI Biosecurity Lab, or AIBL, is a new organization described as the world's first dedicated to AI biosecurity, receiving £100 million to use AI in detecting and monitoring biological threats.

What are OpenAI and Anthropic contributing to the UK biosecurity lab?

OpenAI and Anthropic are contributing up to £200 million in AI model credits, meaning access to their systems rather than cash. The figure sets a ceiling rather than a guaranteed amount. Google DeepMind and London-based life sciences startup Basecamp Research will also assist the lab.

How much funding does the AI Security Institute receive in the October 2026 package?

The AI Security Institute receives an additional £120 million under the package. The institute, which evaluates the risks of the most advanced AI models, was established by the former Conservative government in 2023, and the new allocation suggests the government treats it as core infrastructure rather than a pilot.

What cyber defence programmes are included in the UK's £600 million package?

The package allocates £130 million to two new programmes, the National Cyber Shield and the National Exposure and Real-Time Vulnerability Centre, focused on improving cyber defences for critical infrastructure and the wider economy. The National Cyber Security Centre will also receive an unspecified sum to expand in Manchester.

When was the UK AI security funding announced and how does it relate to the Budget?

Reuters reported the funding was set out on Saturday, October 24, 2026. NewsCord reported that the £100 million AI Biosecurity Lab forms part of Wednesday's Budget, with the announcement coming ahead of that Budget.

Sources

Initia Blockchain Halt Follows $2.7M Unauthorized Token Minting Exploit

Initia Blockchain Halt Follows $2.7M Unauthorized Token Minting Exploit

The Initia blockchain halt began Friday, October 23, 2026, when the modular platform stopped its layer one network and connected rollups after an attacker exploited a security flaw to mint an estimated $2.7 million worth of tokens. Co-founder Ezaan Mangalji confirmed the unauthorized minting, which forced the team to suspend operations across the entire network while investigators assessed the damage.

The Initia blockchain halt carries weight beyond a single project because the platform coordinates activity across multiple connected networks. A vulnerability in the main chain can therefore affect applications and services built on top of it, leaving users and partners exposed while the network remains offline.

Initia Blockchain Halt Announced on X

The official Initia account on X announced the suspension at 12 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, stating that the layer one chain and rollups had been stopped as of 3:41:30 PM UTC due to a security incident. The team said it was actively investigating and working to establish the full scope of any impact alongside security teams, validators and exchanges.

As of 7:45 p.m. Friday, roughly seven hours after the initial halt, the chain remained offline and stuck at block height 23365925. According to scan.initia.xyz, the layer one blockchain had not resumed operations, and the official X account had not confirmed the total financial damage or announced when normal operations would restart.

The extended downtime left users unable to move assets or interact with applications on the network. Developers provided no timeline for restoring service, and the lack of a confirmed damage figure added uncertainty for token holders and partner projects that rely on Initia for cross-chain coordination.

The decision to halt the chain rather than allow it to continue processing blocks reflects the seriousness of the exploit. By freezing the network, the team aimed to prevent further unauthorized minting and limit the attacker's ability to move additional funds off the platform.

MoveVM Flaw Enabled Token Minting

Mangalji attributed the breach to a previously unknown vulnerability in Initia's MoveVM implementation on the Cosmos SDK. He described it as a Day 0 bug that allowed the exploiter to mint additional tokens on the layer one chain, though he confirmed the flaw did not affect native INIT tokens.

The attacker was able to mint and bridge out approximately $2.7 million worth of AUSD, ETH and USDC before the chain was paused, according to Mangalji. Initia's layer one chain was built on the Cosmos SDK using CometBFT consensus, and the platform aims to simplify how separate cryptocurrency networks interact with one another.

Because Initia's architecture links its main chain to a series of rollups, a flaw in the base layer can ripple outward. The Initia blockchain halt therefore disrupted not only the core network but also the connected systems that rely on it for coordination and settlement.

The use of MoveVM on Cosmos SDK represents a technical choice that combines the Move programming language's virtual machine with the Cosmos ecosystem's modular framework. A bug in that integration point gave the attacker a path to create tokens that did not exist before the exploit.

Agora and Upbit Respond to Exploit

Agora, the firm that issues the AUSD stablecoin, said its own token contract was not compromised in the incident. The company noted it has no smart contracts deployed on Initia and confirmed that AUSD deployments on all networks and Agora operations continue as normal.

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit suspended INIT deposits and withdrawals in response to the breach. The exchange took the step while the Initia blockchain remained offline and the full extent of the exploit was still being determined.

The moves by Agora and Upbit illustrate how third parties react when a coordinating chain goes down. Stablecoin issuers must reassure users that their assets are safe, while exchanges often pause transfers to prevent further losses until the situation becomes clearer.

Agora's statement that it has no smart contracts on Initia means the AUSD tokens minted by the attacker were created through the MoveVM flaw rather than through any vulnerability in Agora's own code. That distinction matters for users trying to understand where the risk originated and which systems remain secure.

INIT Token Price Recovers After Initial Drop

INIT initially slipped following news of the exploit but later rebounded, standing 12.5% higher over the last 24 hours. The token has recorded a 65.8% gain over the past 30 days since September.

The price recovery occurred even as the blockchain remained halted and developers had not yet provided a timeline for restoring operations. The incident highlights the risks facing modular blockchain platforms that coordinate activity across multiple networks.

Market participants appeared to separate the technical failure from the token's recent performance, at least in the short term. Whether that confidence holds will likely depend on how quickly the team can bring the network back online and provide a full accounting of the losses.

The Initia blockchain halt serves as a reminder that even well-designed platforms can harbor undiscovered vulnerabilities. The team's response, including the decision to pause the network and engage with security teams, validators and exchanges, will shape how the project recovers and how users assess its reliability going forward.

Conclusion

Initia's layer one blockchain and connected rollups remained offline as of Friday evening, with the chain stuck at block height 23365925 following an exploit that minted an estimated $2.7 million in tokens. Co-founder Ezaan Mangalji identified the cause as a Day 0 bug in the platform's MoveVM on Cosmos SDK, though native INIT tokens were not affected. Developers have not announced when the network will resume operations or confirmed the final financial impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused the Initia blockchain halt on October 23, 2026?

Initia halted its layer one chain and rollups after an attacker exploited a previously unknown Day 0 bug in the platform's MoveVM implementation on the Cosmos SDK. The flaw allowed the exploiter to mint additional tokens on the layer one chain, prompting the team to suspend operations at 3:41:30 PM UTC.

How much did the attacker mint in the Initia exploit?

The attacker minted and bridged out approximately $2.7 million worth of AUSD, ETH and USDC before the chain was paused, according to Initia co-founder Ezaan Mangalji. The unauthorized minting occurred through the MoveVM vulnerability.

Were native INIT tokens affected by the MoveVM bug?

No, native INIT tokens were not affected by the vulnerability. Co-founder Ezaan Mangalji confirmed that the Day 0 bug allowed the exploiter to mint additional tokens on the Initia layer one but did not apply to native INIT tokens.

Is the AUSD stablecoin compromised after the Initia hack?

Agora said its AUSD token contract was not breached and that the company does not operate any smart contracts on the Initia network. The issuer added that AUSD continues to function normally across all other supported platforms.

When will the Initia blockchain resume operations?

As of the latest information from scan.initia.xyz, the layer one blockchain remains offline and developers have not announced when normal operations will resume. The chain was stuck at block height 23365925 as of 7:45 p.m. Friday, roughly seven hours after the halt.

Sources

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Moonshot AI Curbs Hacking Ability Ahead of Open-Weights Release

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Moonshot AI Curbs Hacking Ability Ahead of Open-Weights Release

Moonshot AI said on Saturday, October 24, 2026, that it deliberately weakened the hacking skills of Kimi K3.1 Pro, the most advanced system the Beijing startup has built, by pulling cyber-related material out of the training process before release. The company said the change costs the model only a modest slice of its offensive capability, according to Crypto Briefing.

The decision matters because Moonshot plans to publish the model's weight files, reportedly by November 4, 2026, which would make Kimi K3.1 Pro the highest-scoring open-weights model available. Few Chinese labs have publicly acknowledged deliberately shaping a model's offensive-security ability, and Moonshot connects that choice directly to the planned release of the weights.

What Moonshot Removed and Why

The company said it scrubbed cyber-related material from two stages of development: the training corpus and the reinforcement-learning environments, while keeping general coding skills in place. Moonshot said its engineers traced steadily improving vulnerability-research performance to cyber-related content embedded in the general mid-training corpus and to cyber-related tasks in the reinforcement-learning mix, then identified and removed that data from both training stages for the open-weight release.

The approach sits earlier in the pipeline than the refusal filters that dominate public safety discussion of language models. Rather than training a fully capable model and then teaching it to decline malicious requests, Moonshot changed what the model learned from in the first place. The company said it stripped cyber tasks from the reinforcement-learning environments, which targets agentic skill rather than raw knowledge, and said it kept general coding capabilities, suggesting a narrow filter rather than a blanket purge.

Moonshot framed the work as a way to avoid releasing open weights that would extend the absolute frontier of cyber capability. The company does not present the model as harmless for security work; its narrower pledge is that Kimi K3.1 Pro will not rank as the most capable publicly available tool for attacking software. Moonshot said the model's cyber skills still trail those of top proprietary systems that have been on the market for three months or longer.

According to Crypto Briefing, the company said its goal is for this model not to advance the boundaries of cyber-offensive capability, with incremental improvements to defensive safeguards planned for future releases.

The 81.0% Figure and Its Limits

On an internal test of finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities, the released model reached 81.0%, while a comparable build trained without the risk-reduction measures reached 90.5%, according to Reuters and The Information. Moonshot ran its released configuration and the unfiltered version, then compared the scores.

The benchmark, which Moonshot calls xdev-bench-hard, consists of expert-curated, source-code-based vulnerability discovery and exploitation tasks, with scores measured at pass@3, according to Unite. Moonshot said the gap between the two builds demonstrates that removing the data cuts cyber capability well below what the same training pipeline would otherwise deliver.

All of the figures behind the claim are self-reported, and no outside party has verified them. Moonshot designed the test, chose the environment, ran both versions and reported the scores. A fair test of the 81.0% claim would need independent researchers to evaluate the released model on exploit tasks of their own choosing, in a setting Moonshot did not construct.

The filtered model still represents a large jump over its predecessor. Reports on the company's comparison put the earlier Kimi K3 at 33.3% on the same test, and The Decoder reported that DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash reaches 85.7%. Moonshot said Kimi K3.1 Pro outperformed K3 despite the filtering, and that it retained general coding strength.

A Stronger Model Underneath the Curbs

Kimi K3.1 Pro is a post-trained version of Kimi K3, built with what Moonshot describes as substantially larger post-training compute. The company describes it as its most capable 3T-class open-weight model to date, with a context window of 1 million tokens. The Decoder reported the model matches K3 in size, at 2.8 trillion total parameters with 104 billion active.

On Terminal-Bench 4.0, which evaluates coding agents on realistic, resource-constrained terminal tasks, K3.1 Pro scored 65.7%, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 58.2% and narrowly behind Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.4%, according to Unite. Crypto Briefing noted the result places an open-weights Chinese model alongside a top closed US system on that benchmark.

The model jumped to fourth place on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with 55 points, just behind Claude Opus 5.5, according to The Decoder. Moonshot also reported a top score of 64.4 on OfficeQA Pro v2, a test of complex fiscal data analysis using real financial documents, and said the model's claim-level hallucination rate on an internal stress test fell from 23.4% for K3 to 8.3%.

Moonshot also released a faster companion variant, Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed, which the company said delivers two to three times the standard model's speed with identical capabilities. The model is live on Kimi.ai, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API, with pricing of $2.00 input and $10.00 output per million tokens, according to MarkTechPost. Kimi Enterprise administrators can enable K3.1 Pro for their organizations, with access off by default at launch, according to Unite.

Pressure Behind the Decision

The announcement did not arrive in a vacuum. Concern is rising among governments, tech firms and security researchers that AI could lower the cost and difficulty of sophisticated hacking, according to The Economic Times. Against that backdrop, a lab announcing cyber curbs in a model reads as a response to pressure rather than an isolated gesture.

The decision also comes after Kimi K3 attracted scrutiny for how well it handled cyber tasks. Crypto Briefing described the new release as partly an answer to that attention, an effort to demonstrate that Moonshot can ship a more capable model without distributing a more dangerous attack tool.

Moonshot competes with closed Western labs and with other Chinese open-weights developers, and its filtering experiment adds a new axis to that competition: how much risk a model carries once released. The company's approach stands out because it still works after weights go public, unlike refusal-based safeguards that can be stripped from an open model. Moonshot has effectively volunteered a disclosure that competitors will feel pressure to match or explain away.

What Comes Next for Kimi K3.1 Pro

If Moonshot releases the weights as planned by November 4, 2026, researchers and security teams will be able to test the company's claims independently. Once weights are public, a user with modest hardware and a security dataset could also try to rebuild some of what Moonshot removed, which limits how much any training-time filter can guarantee.

Moonshot will have to show that the 81.0% score leaves enough room for legitimate use. If the company's claim holds, people who use the model for ordinary programming should see little change. The commercial effect of the announcement is hard to size, since the sources give no revenue or usage figures for the model beyond its API pricing.

The company's stated goal is narrower than making the model safe: it is to avoid extending the absolute frontier of cyber capability. That phrasing assumes a frontier that holds still, and it does not, so defenders cannot wait for a verdict on Kimi K3.1 Pro before adjusting their own posture.

Conclusion

Moonshot AI has released Kimi K3.1 Pro with cyber-related data deliberately removed from both its training corpus and reinforcement-learning environments, a trade the company says cut internal exploit-test performance from 90.5% to 81.0% while leaving general coding strength intact. All of the figures are self-reported and unverified. The next concrete step is the planned open-weights release, reportedly by November 4, 2026, which would let outside researchers test the claims on tasks and in environments Moonshot did not control, and would make the model the highest-scoring open-weights system available if the release proceeds as planned.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Moonshot AI remove from Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Moonshot AI said it removed cyber-related data from both the training corpus and the reinforcement-learning environments used to develop Kimi K3.1 Pro, while retaining general coding skills. The company said it traced improving vulnerability-research performance to cyber content in those training stages and stripped it out for the open-weight release.

How much did the filtering cut Kimi K3.1 Pro's hacking ability?

On Moonshot's internal benchmark of vulnerability discovery and exploitation tasks, Kimi K3.1 Pro scored 81.0%, versus 90.5% for a similar version trained without the risk-reduction measures, according to Reuters and The Information. The earlier Kimi K3 scored 33.3% on the same test. All figures are self-reported and not independently verified.

When will Kimi K3.1 Pro's open weights be released?

Moonshot reportedly planned to publish the model's weight files by November 4, 2026. If the release proceeds as planned, Kimi K3.1 Pro would become the highest-scoring open-weights model available, and outside researchers would be able to test Moonshot's safety claims independently.

How does Kimi K3.1 Pro perform on coding benchmarks?

On Terminal-Bench 4.0, K3.1 Pro scored 65.7%, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 58.2% and narrowly behind Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.4%, according to Unite. The model also reached fourth place on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with 55 points, according to The Decoder.

How much does Kimi K3.1 Pro cost to use?

Pricing for K3.1 Pro is $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, according to MarkTechPost. The model is live on Kimi.ai, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API, and a faster Highspeed variant runs at two to three times the speed with identical capabilities.

Sources